Skip to main content

Security report for statuspage.io

Atlassian · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Atlassian's Statuspage is a leading SaaS product designed to provide real-time incident communication and status updates to customers and employees. The platform targets support, IT, DevOps, incident response, marketing, and sales teams, enabling them to build trust and transparency during service disruptions. The website reflects Atlassian's enterprise-grade market position with comprehensive service offerings, multiple pricing tiers, and integration capabilities with popular monitoring and alerting tools. The content is professionally presented with strong branding and multimedia testimonials, supporting a high level of business credibility. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including React-based components, Contentful CMS, Google reCAPTCHA, and OneTrust for consent management. Hosting is managed via Atlassian's CDN infrastructure, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility considerations are well addressed, contributing to a positive user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, use of bot protection, and consent management. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not prominently published, representing an area for improvement. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for large enterprises and justified for security reasons. No suspicious indicators were found. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with robust security and privacy practices, supporting Atlassian's reputation as a trusted technology provider. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information to further enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of statuspage.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching statuspage.io

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
82
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention statuspage.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,803
Employees
0
Customers
1,768
Third parties
35
Weak passwords
14%

24 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for statuspage.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Atlassian Statuspage operates in the technology sector as a SaaS provider specializing in incident communication and status updates. The business model is subscription-based with tiered pricing plans catering to different organizational sizes and needs. The company leverages strong partnerships and integrations with major service providers like DigitalOcean and Dropbox, enhancing its ecosystem. The target customers include IT, DevOps, support, and marketing teams seeking to improve transparency and reduce support costs. Atlassian's market position is strong, supported by extensive customer testimonials and a broad user base. The website's multilingual support and comprehensive content indicate a global reach and enterprise focus.

Security posture

The website exhibits a high level of security maturity with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. Security headers are likely implemented though not explicitly visible in the HTML. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency in security governance. There is no evidence of a published vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the presence of consent mechanisms and privacy policies. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized disclosure processes.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security controls and practices.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance user privacy controls and transparency around data retention policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Atlassian
Description
Statuspage provides real-time incident communication and status updates. Keep customers informed, build trust, and enhance transparency.
Key services
Incident communication, Status updates, Subscriber management, Integrations with monitoring and alerting tools, Customizable status pages
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (implied by JSX components), YouTube API, Google reCAPTCHA, OneTrust Consent Management, Contentful CMS (implied by Contentful tokens), CDN (Atlassian's own CDN)
Frameworks
React (implied), OneTrust Consent Management
Platforms
Cloud hosting (likely Atlassian Cloud)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Consent management via OneTrust
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
OneTrust, Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
OneTrust Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong branding and consistent corporate identity
  3. Comprehensive product and pricing information presented
  4. Multiple language support available
  5. Use of modern web technologies and consent management
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found
  8. WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable, typical for large corporations
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React components, Contentful CMS, and Atlassian's CDN infrastructure, ensuring fast load times and excellent mobile responsiveness. Integration with YouTube APIs and Google reCAPTCHA enhances user engagement and security. The site uses OneTrust for consent management, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. The technical implementation is robust with good SEO and accessibility features. No technical debt or performance bottlenecks were observed in the provided content. Opportunities exist to improve security transparency and incident response readiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100Low23 findingsView report
  2. 80/100 +1Low23 findingsView report
  3. 79/100Low19 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with statuspage.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review statuspage.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.