Skip to main content

Security report for staticfile.org

河南泉磐网络科技有限公司 · Technology · China

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Staticfile.org is operated by 河南泉磐网络科技有限公司, a Chinese company established in 2013. The website provides a free, fast, and open CDN service focused on hosting and accelerating access to popular open source libraries such as React, Vue, Angular, and jQuery. It targets developers and open source communities by offering a repository for static files including JavaScript, CSS, images, and other assets. The platform supports library submissions from users, fostering community contributions. Technically, the site is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, delivering a responsive and performant user experience. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and multilingual support (Chinese and English). Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, but lacks advanced security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies. WHOIS data confirms a long-standing domain registration consistent with the business profile, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, Staticfile.org is a credible and technically sound service with room for improvement in privacy and security policy transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of staticfile.org. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching staticfile.org

This scan found 32 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
30
DNS health
55
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Staticfile.org occupies a niche in the technology sector as a free CDN provider for open source libraries, leveraging partnerships with entities like Qiniu Cloud and community support from Juejin. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on providing infrastructure rather than direct monetization. The target market includes developers and organizations requiring reliable CDN access to popular frontend libraries. The company benefits from a stable domain registration and a consistent brand presence. However, the absence of explicit business contact details and formal policies may limit enterprise adoption. The platform's integration with GitHub for feedback and social media sharing indicates active community engagement. Growth potential lies in expanding service offerings and enhancing compliance and security measures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with mandatory HTTPS usage ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a missed opportunity to harden the site against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security issues. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are absent, posing compliance risks especially under GDPR. No contact emails or phone numbers related to security or abuse handling were found. Overall, while the site is not evidently vulnerable, it lacks comprehensive security governance and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and security contact channels to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear contact information including support and security-related emails to improve communication and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
河南泉磐网络科技有限公司
Description
提供一个免费、快速、开放的CDN服务仓库，收录优秀开源库并为其提供CDN加速服务，支持JavaScript、CSS、图片和swt等静态文件的提交和访问。
Key services
CDN加速服务, 开源库托管与访问, 开源库提交入口
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, JavaScript, CSS, CDN
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides free CDN services for open source libraries.
  2. Content is primarily in Chinese with English option available.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. WHOIS data shows long-term registration with Chinese company.
  8. Social media sharing links present for Weibo, Twitter, GitHub.
  9. No advertising or tracking networks detected beyond custom analytics.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack featuring Next.js and React, enabling server-side rendering and efficient client-side interactivity. The use of preloading for fonts and CSS indicates attention to performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility considerations, though these could be further enhanced. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based implementation. Hosting details are not explicit but the presence of a custom analytics script and CDN usage indicates a well-managed infrastructure. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Overall, the technical implementation is robust with minor areas for improvement in accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 40/100High39 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with staticfile.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review staticfile.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.