Skip to main content

Security report for staticfile.net

eName Technology Co., Ltd. · Technology · China

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Staticfile CDN is a technology-focused service providing free, fast, and open CDN acceleration for popular open source libraries such as React, Vue, Angular, and jQuery. The platform targets developers and the open source community, offering a repository and submission portal for static files including JavaScript, CSS, and images. The business operates primarily in China and has been active since 2015, with domain registration consistent with its origin and purpose. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Next.js and React, delivering a fast and mobile-optimized experience. The infrastructure supports HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, though DNSSEC is not enabled. The site lacks some advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security posture. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and domain status locks to prevent unauthorized domain transfers or deletions. However, it does not publish a security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies reduces compliance confidence. Overall, Staticfile CDN presents a trustworthy and professional service with good technical implementation and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing privacy and security policies, adding security headers, and providing clear contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching staticfile.net

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
70
Security headers
15
Email security
30
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Staticfile CDN occupies a niche market as a free CDN provider for open source libraries, primarily serving developers in China. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a broad repository of popular libraries with community submission capabilities. The business model is service-oriented, relying on free access and community engagement rather than direct monetization. Partnerships with technology providers like Qiniu and community support from platforms like Juejin enhance its ecosystem. Growth indicators include a long domain registration period and active GitHub presence. The company is positioned as an important entity in the technology sector with a medium size and a focus on developer tools.

Security posture

The security maturity of Staticfile CDN is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration includes protective status flags. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies indicates gaps in defense-in-depth and compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which may hinder rapid response to security events. Data protection practices are not explicitly documented, and no GDPR compliance indicators are present. The site does not collect sensitive user data via forms, reducing exposure. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved with formal policies and technical enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and incident response contacts.
  5. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eName Technology Co., Ltd.
Description
Staticfile CDN provides a free, fast, and open CDN service hosting a repository of popular open source libraries including JavaScript, CSS, images, and other static files. It aims to improve access speed and stability for users and allows community submissions of open source libraries.
Key services
CDN acceleration for open source libraries, Open source library submission platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, JavaScript, CSS, CDN technology
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status locks preventing unauthorized transfer or deletion

Analytics and tracking

Services
Custom analytic.js script from api.staticfile.net
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Chinese with English language toggle available.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible on the site.
  5. Social media presence includes GitHub, Twitter, and Weibo sharing links.
  6. Uses HTTPS with valid SSL configuration.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  8. Website uses modern web technologies including Next.js and React.
  9. Focus on providing free CDN services for open source libraries.
  10. Domain is registered with a reputable Chinese registrar and has a long registration period.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Next.js and React, ensuring good performance and mobile responsiveness. The use of CDN for static assets and open source libraries supports fast content delivery. The site includes meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). However, accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization could be enhanced. Hosting details are not explicit, but the infrastructure appears stable and performant. There is no detected CMS, indicating a custom or framework-based build. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security configurations and compliance documentation are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 49/100High40 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with staticfile.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review staticfile.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.