Skip to main content

Security report for staticec.com

六度人和 (EC CRM) · Technology · China

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

六度人和 (EC CRM) operates a professional Chinese-language website offering CRM systems and marketing cloud solutions targeted at enterprise customers. The company positions itself as a provider of growth-oriented CRM software with a focus on usability and marketing integration. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor and related plugins, indicating a modern but standard CMS infrastructure. The site includes a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting some awareness of privacy compliance, though explicit privacy and terms of service pages are not found in the provided content. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and explicit security policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency, impacting trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of staticec.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching staticec.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
30
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets the Chinese market with CRM and marketing cloud products, likely operating on a SaaS model. The website content and structure suggest a medium-sized company with a focus on technology and enterprise clients. The lack of visible contact details and certifications limits external validation of business credibility. The company leverages WordPress ecosystem technologies for website management, which is common for businesses of this size. No clear partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the content. The business model appears focused on software sales and marketing services, with potential for growth in the Chinese CRM market.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent banner, indicating baseline security and privacy practices. However, no advanced security headers were detected, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The absence of contact information for security incidents and lack of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggest limited maturity in security governance. The missing WHOIS data is a notable risk factor, as it obscures domain ownership and registration details. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adding security headers, publishing policies, and ensuring domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration details to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain platform security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
六度人和 (EC CRM)
Description
六度人和提供开箱即用的增长型CRM系统和在线CRM软件，专注于营销云等产品，面向企业客户提供客户关系管理解决方案。
Key services
CRM系统, 在线CRM软件, 营销云
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, PHP, Essential Addons for Elementor, Elementskit, OceanWP Theme
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Chinese language targeting Chinese market.
  2. Professional CRM software provider with marketing cloud products.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with Elementor and related plugins.
  4. Cookie consent banner present indicating some privacy compliance effort.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the provided content.
  9. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered publicly, which is unusual.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and several plugins including Essential Addons and Elementskit, indicating a modern but common technology stack. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and Alibaba CDN for icon fonts. Performance is moderate with standard optimizations but no advanced caching or CDN details found. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design evident. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA roles and skip links present. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and canonical links but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected in the provided content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium37 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with staticec.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review staticec.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.