Skip to main content

Security report for stape.net

Stape Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stape Inc. is a technology company specializing in server-side tracking solutions, primarily through Google Tag Manager hosting and various API gateways for platforms like Meta, TikTok, and Snapchat. Positioned as an industry leader with over 100,000 customers, Stape offers a comprehensive SaaS platform that simplifies server-side tracking, improves data quality, and enhances marketing ROI. Their services cater to businesses and marketers seeking advanced tracking infrastructure with a focus on privacy and compliance. Technically, Stape employs modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring fast performance, mobile optimization, and good accessibility. Their security posture is strong, supported by strict Content-Security-Policy headers and multiple certifications such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance. The website demonstrates professionalism, clear navigation, and extensive content including blogs, case studies, and product details. Overall, Stape presents a trustworthy and mature digital presence with a solid foundation in security and privacy.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of stape.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stape.net

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Stape operates in the technology sector with a focus on server-side tracking and data privacy solutions. Their business model revolves around SaaS offerings with tiered plans including freemium and enterprise custom solutions. The company targets digital marketers, agencies, and enterprises requiring reliable and compliant tracking infrastructure. Competitive advantages include ease of setup, comprehensive power-ups, and strong compliance certifications. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for hosting and gateway services. The company maintains a robust partnership ecosystem and offers extensive customer support. Growth indicators include a large client base and active content marketing through blogs and case studies. Strategic observations highlight Stape's emphasis on privacy compliance and security as key differentiators in a competitive market.

Security posture

Stape demonstrates a high level of security maturity with multiple industry-standard certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR). The website enforces a strict Content-Security-Policy and uses secure HTTPS connections. Privacy compliance is evident through detailed policies and consent management mechanisms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. However, the absence of a public incident response policy or vulnerability disclosure program suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Data protection practices include anonymization power-ups and European cloud infrastructure for GDPR compliance. Overall, the security culture appears strong, with continuous monitoring and 24/7 support.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Maintain clear and detailed data retention policies to further strengthen privacy compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Stape Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stape Inc.
Description
Stape provides tools for server-side Google Tag Manager: hosting, power-ups, and APIs. Improve data quality, extend cookie lifetime, and manage consent effectively.
Key services
Server Google Tag Manager Hosting, Meta Conversions API Gateway Hosting, TikTok Events API Gateway Hosting, Snapchat Conversions API Gateway Hosting, Signals Gateway, Integrations and power-ups
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, Vanta (for compliance badges)
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Cloud hosting (implied), Google Cloud Platform (alternative to), European cloud servers
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • Strict Content-Security-Policy
  • No object-src or base-uri vulnerabilities
  • Use of cookie consent management
  • Anonymizer power-up for data privacy
  • GDPR compliance
  • ISO 27001 and SOC 2 certifications

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Meta Conversions API
Marketing tools
Meta Conversions API Gateway, TikTok Events API Gateway, Snapchat Conversions API Gateway
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong focus on server-side tracking solutions with multiple gateway products.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management implemented.
  4. Strong security posture with multiple certifications and strict CSP header.
  5. Active blog and case studies demonstrating expertise and customer success.
  6. Multiple language support and internationalization evident.
  7. Clear contact information and 24/7 support availability.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks for performance and UX.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, ensuring server-side rendering and fast load times. It uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, integrated with server-side tracking solutions. The tech stack includes Cookiebot for consent management and Vanta for compliance badges. Hosting details are not explicitly stated but imply cloud infrastructure with European server options. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data. Technical risks are minimal, with no detected outdated or vulnerable libraries. Opportunities exist to improve incident response transparency and vulnerability management. Overall, the technical implementation supports a robust, scalable, and secure platform aligned with business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 87/100Low19 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stape.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stape.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.