Skip to main content

Security report for stape.de

Stape, Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stape, Inc. is a US-based technology company specializing in server-side tracking solutions primarily for marketing and analytics professionals. Their platform offers a comprehensive suite of services including Google Tag Manager hosting, Meta Conversions API Gateway, and integrations with major advertising platforms such as TikTok and Snapchat. Positioned as an industry leader with over 200,000 customers, Stape provides scalable, secure, and GDPR-compliant server-side tracking infrastructure with enterprise-grade features and 24/7 support. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like React and Next.js, hosted with Cloudflare, and employs strong security headers and HTTPS encryption. The company demonstrates a mature security posture with certifications including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance. Overall, the website and business exhibit high professionalism, trustworthiness, and technical sophistication, making Stape a credible and reliable provider in the server-side tracking market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stape.de

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention stape.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
21
Employees
0
Customers
21
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
5%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for stape.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Stape operates a SaaS business model targeting businesses and marketers who require enhanced data quality and privacy-compliant tracking solutions. Their competitive advantages include ease of setup, cost-effective plans, and a broad range of power-ups and integrations that address challenges like cookie deprecation and ad blocker bypassing. Revenue streams likely include subscription plans, enterprise custom contracts, and free trials to attract new customers. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem, including integrations with major ad platforms and scheduling tools like Calendly. Growth indicators include a large customer base and active content marketing through blogs and case studies. Strategic observations suggest Stape is well-positioned to capitalize on increasing demand for privacy-first tracking technologies.

Security posture

Stape exhibits a strong security maturity level with HTTPS enforced, a restrictive Content-Security-Policy, and no exposed sensitive data. The presence of multiple certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR) indicates robust compliance and data protection practices. However, the absence of a public security policy or incident response page and lack of a security.txt file suggest areas for improvement in transparency and vulnerability disclosure. The company uses Cookiebot for consent management, enhancing GDPR compliance. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are positive but could be strengthened with more public documentation. No vulnerabilities or critical security issues were detected in the website content or WHOIS data.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and customer trust.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance public communication of data protection officer contact details and privacy governance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Stape, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stape, Inc.
Description
Stape provides tools for server-side Google Tag Manager: hosting, power-ups, and APIs. Improve data quality, extend cookie lifetime, and manage consent effectively.
Key services
Global Server GTM Hosting, European Server GTM Hosting, Meta Conversions API Gateway Hosting, Stape Gateway for GA4 and Google Ads, TikTok Events API Gateway Hosting, Snapchat Conversions API Gateway Hosting, Integrations and Power-ups
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cloudflare DNS, Cookiebot, Calendly
Frameworks
React, Next.js
Platforms
Cloudflare
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content-Security-Policy restricting scripts and objects
  • No inline object sources
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Conversions API
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick, Twitter Ads, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Meta Conversions API
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong focus on server-side tracking solutions for marketing and analytics.
  3. Comprehensive legal and privacy documentation present.
  4. Multiple certifications and compliance badges displayed.
  5. Robust technical implementation with modern frameworks and security headers.
  6. Active content with recent blog posts and case studies.
  7. Clear contact options including email, contact forms, and scheduling links.
  8. No suspicious or malicious indicators found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and scalable technology stack including React and Next.js, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site uses advanced security headers and integrates with multiple third-party services for analytics, marketing, and consent management. The technical implementation supports extensive server-side tracking capabilities with integrations for major ad platforms. There is no indication of technical debt or outdated technologies. Opportunities exist to further improve security transparency and incident response readiness. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and well-suited to support the business's growth and compliance requirements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stape.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stape.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.