Skip to main content

Security report for stallion.ee

AS Stallion Ltd. · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AS Stallion Ltd. is an established Estonian cybersecurity company founded in 1994, specializing in network security solutions such as firewalls, VPNs, data protection, and malware prevention. With over 30 years of experience and offices in Tallinn and Riga, Stallion serves business clients requiring comprehensive IT security and network infrastructure solutions. The company partners with leading global cybersecurity vendors, reinforcing its market position as a trusted provider in the Baltic region. Technically, the website employs basic web technologies including HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, with Google Analytics for visitor tracking. However, the site lacks modern security implementations such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers, and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. The site’s design and navigation are functional but could benefit from improved mobile optimization and accessibility. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and security headers represents a significant risk, potentially exposing users to data interception and other attacks. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps. No forms or input fields are present on the main page, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. The company’s domain registration data aligns well with its business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, while Stallion demonstrates strong business credibility and domain trustworthiness, the website’s security posture and privacy compliance require urgent improvements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching stallion.ee

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
65
Email security
100
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Stallion operates in the technology sector, focusing on cybersecurity and network solutions for enterprises and institutions. Its business model is B2B, providing both products and services including planning, deployment, management, and support of IT security systems. The company leverages partnerships with major global cybersecurity vendors to enhance its offerings and market reach. Growth indicators include long-standing market presence and regional offices. The company targets organizations needing advanced cybersecurity infrastructure, emphasizing innovation and operational security. The partnership ecosystem is robust, supporting competitive advantages in technology and expertise.

Security posture

The website’s security maturity is moderate to low due to missing HTTPS enforcement and lack of security headers, which are fundamental for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness for security events. GDPR compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies and no consent mechanisms for tracking. However, the absence of exposed sensitive data and vulnerable libraries is positive. The company should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance measures to enhance security posture and regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with valid SSL/TLS certificates and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and incident response.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AS Stallion Ltd.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AS Stallion Ltd.
Description
Eestlaste loodud firma, mille lahenduste hulgast leiab iga ettevõte küberturbeks vajaliku: Tulemüürid, VPN, Võrguseadmed, Andmekaitse jm. Stallion on info- ja kommunikatsioonisüsteemide turvalahenduste loomise, tarnimise ja teenindamisega tegelev ettevõte, asutatud 1994. aastal, tugeva fookusega küberturbe lahendustele alates 1997. aastast. Kontorid asuvad Tallinnas ja Riias.
Key services
Tulemüürid, VPN, Võrguseadmed, Andmekaitse, Kaugtöö lahendused, Pahavara tõkestamine, Autentimine, Turvalisuse kontroll
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics (ga.js), JavaScript, HTML5, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in footer with email, phone, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected on the main page; contact is via mailto links.
  5. Use of Google Analytics for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. No visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement in provided HTML content.
  7. Website is primarily in Estonian with language switch options for Latvian and English.
  8. Strong focus on cybersecurity solutions and services with long company history.
  9. Partner list includes major global cybersecurity vendors, enhancing trust.
  10. No social media links detected in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, including Google Analytics for tracking. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks, indicating a possibly custom or legacy implementation. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization detected. SEO is basic with meta descriptions and Open Graph tags present but no advanced structured data like JSON-LD. Accessibility and mobile optimization are minimal, suggesting room for modernization. No hosting provider or CDN information is available from the content. Technical risks include lack of HTTPS and security headers, which could impact business operations through security incidents or regulatory penalties.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with stallion.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review stallion.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.