Skip to main content

Security report for st-ulrich-lvhs.de

Bildungshaus Kloster St. Ulrich · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bildungshaus Kloster St. Ulrich is a small, non-profit educational institution affiliated with the Erzdiözese Freiburg, focusing on providing learning and experiential spaces primarily for rural communities. Their offerings include seminars, workshops, and spiritual retreats targeting a broad audience including families, youth, and adults interested in personal and societal development. The website reflects a well-structured, content-rich platform with clear navigation and consistent branding, supporting their educational mission. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies such as JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks, and no hosting provider information is available. SEO practices appear adequate with proper meta tags and descriptive content. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (assumed from domain context though not explicitly confirmed), but lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data shows privacy-protected name servers, which is reasonable for this type of institution. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching st-ulrich-lvhs.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institution operates in the education and non-profit sectors, serving a niche market focused on rural community education and spiritual development. Its business model revolves around offering seminars and events rather than commercial sales. The affiliation with Erzdiözese Freiburg provides credibility and a stable partnership ecosystem. The website's clear presentation of contact details and program offerings supports user engagement and growth potential. No direct revenue streams or commercial partnerships are evident from the data. The social media presence on Instagram and Facebook suggests active community outreach. The lack of advanced marketing or analytics tools indicates a conservative digital strategy aligned with non-profit values.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS likely enabled but lacks advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security policy pages are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms may pose GDPR compliance risks. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The WHOIS privacy protection is justified and does not raise suspicion. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing standard web security best practices and formalizing privacy and incident response policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve privacy transparency.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to broaden user inclusivity and comply with accessibility standards.
  5. Consider integrating basic analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user engagement and improve services.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bildungshaus Kloster St. Ulrich
Description
Bildungshaus Kloster St. Ulrich is an educational institution of the Erzdiözese Freiburg offering learning and experience spaces based on a Christian worldview, focusing on rural areas.
Key services
Seminars, Workshops, Spiritual retreats, Family and youth programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners found, which may be a GDPR compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in the footer with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage; contact likely via email or phone.
  5. Social media presence on Instagram and Facebook is linked.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  8. Content is focused on education, spirituality, and community seminars.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard web technologies (HTML5, CSS, JavaScript) without evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. The site structure is clear and mobile-optimized, supporting good user experience. Performance is moderate, with no heavy external dependencies detected. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts suggests minimal data collection, aligning with privacy considerations. The hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not explicitly available, limiting full technical assessment. There is an opportunity to modernize by adopting a CMS or framework for easier content management and to implement security best practices such as security headers and cookie consent mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with st-ulrich-lvhs.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review st-ulrich-lvhs.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.