Security report for ssl247.com
Sectigo · Technology · United States
Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.
Sectigo is a leading global provider of digital certificate management and web security solutions, serving enterprises of all sizes with a comprehensive suite of products including SSL/TLS certificates, certificate lifecycle management platforms, and signing certificates. The company holds a strong market position as a trusted Certificate Authority with over 20 years of experience and a broad partner and subsidiary ecosystem. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with extensive resources, customer testimonials, and industry awards, reinforcing their credibility. Technically, Sectigo's website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, RequireJS, and various analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, FullStory, and VWO. The site is built on Craft CMS and integrates with Salesforce for customer support and Stripe for payment processing. Performance and mobile optimization are well addressed, with good accessibility and SEO practices in place. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, implements multiple security headers, and uses secure forms with CSRF protection. The presence of multiple certifications and trust seals further strengthens their security posture. Privacy compliance is robust, with clear privacy and cookie policies, consent mechanisms, and GDPR adherence. However, explicit security policy and incident response contact pages are not found, representing an area for improvement. Overall, Sectigo presents a high level of business credibility, technical maturity, and security awareness. The website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with relevant privacy regulations, making it a reliable platform for customers and partners alike.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 95/ 100 · Low
- Checks completed
- 7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
- High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
- CWE-319
- OWASP A04:2025
- ASVS V3.4.1
- RFC 6797 §6.1.1
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: hsts_min_age 63072000
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(a): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(a): Cryptography
- NIST SC-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-8: Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
- High
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- High
Weak Protocols Supported
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
- CWE-327
- OWASP A04:2025
- ASVS V12.1.1
- RFC 8996
- RFC 7568
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: tls_versions TLSv1.2, TLSv1.3
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(b): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(b): Cryptography
- NIST SC-8(1): NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-8(1): Cryptographic Protection
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching ssl247.com
This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 77
- Security headers
- 65
- Email security
- 70
- DNS health
- 75
- Network security
- 100
- GDPR outside view
- 95
- Average
- 80
Not counted
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
- Implement and publicly link a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
- Provide clear contact channels for incident response, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
- Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
- Enhance transparency around data protection officer contact information and data retention policies.
Contact details published on the site
- Addresses
- Legal name
- Sectigo Limited
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- Sectigo
- Description
- Sectigo is the world’s largest commercial Certificate Authority (CA) and a leading web security solutions company, enabling organizations worldwide to secure their identities, web presence and connected devices. Enterprises of all sizes rely on Sectigo for multi-layer defense against rising and more sophisticated web-based threats across websites, devices, infrastructure, and cloud – from the biggest brands to the smallest websites – so that they can secure today and seize their tomorrow.
- Key services
- TLS/SSL Certificates, Certificate Lifecycle Management (SCM Pro and Enterprise), Signing Certificates (Code Signing, Email Security S/MIME, Document Signing), SiteLock Website Security, Website Backup & Recovery, HackerGuardian PCI Scanning, eIDAS / QWAC Certificates, Quantum Readiness, Postquantum Cryptography
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- jQuery, RequireJS, Slick Carousel, Owl Carousel, YouTube Iframe API, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), FullStory, Cookiebot, Salesforce Embedded Service, Stripe Payment Integration
- Frameworks
- RequireJS
- Platforms
- Salesforce (for chat and support), Stripe (payment processing)
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- excellent
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 90/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- Use of security headers
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Secure forms with CSRF tokens
- Use of CAPTCHA (Cloudflare Turnstile)
- Cookie consent management
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics, FullStory, Hotjar, VWO, Hubspot
- Tracking level
- extensive
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Ad networks
- Google AdSense, Appnexus, PubMatic, StackAdapt, Bidswitch, Casale Media, Adroll, OpenX, Tapad, Triplelift
- Tracking pixels
- FullStory, VWO, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hubspot, OptinMonster
- Marketing tools
- Hubspot, OptinMonster, Evergage
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
- Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
- Multiple security certifications and trust seals displayed.
- Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools with clear consent.
- Comprehensive product and resource offerings targeting enterprise customers.
- Multiple contact channels including emails, phone numbers, and support forms.
- No signs of WAF blocking or security challenges.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with ssl247.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ssl247.com.