Skip to main content

Security report for ssl.lv

fruits GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

fruits GmbH operates a specialized online marketplace for premium domain names, exemplified by the listing of ssl.lv. The platform targets domain buyers and sellers, offering secure transactions with escrow and buyer protection services. The business model includes direct sales, lease-to-own options, and negotiation capabilities, positioning fruits as a niche player in the domain marketplace sector. The company emphasizes secure payment processing and customer trust through transparent policies and testimonials. Technically, the website leverages modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, integrates Stripe for payments, and employs analytics and error monitoring tools like PostHog and Sentry, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and no exposed sensitive data, although explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. Overall, fruits GmbH presents a professional, trustworthy platform with room for enhanced transparency in security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ssl.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

fruits GmbH holds a focused market position as a premium domain marketplace, differentiating itself with buyer protection and lease-to-own payment plans. The partnership with seo.domains and meup.com enhances its domain offerings. Revenue streams likely derive from seller fees and transaction commissions. The target customer segment includes businesses and individuals seeking high-value domain names. Growth indicators include a well-structured website, integration of multiple payment methods, and positive customer testimonials. The partnership ecosystem and use of advanced payment and analytics tools suggest strategic operational maturity. However, the lack of public WHOIS data and limited physical contact information may affect some buyer confidence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and secure payment processing via Stripe. The use of escrow services and buyer protection programs further mitigates transaction risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency. There is no visible security.txt file or dedicated security contact channels. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through privacy and cookie policies, but explicit data protection officer contact details are missing. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced documentation and disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide contact details for a Data Protection Officer or security team.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency on certifications and compliance to boost buyer confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
fruits GmbH
Description
fruits.co is a premium domain marketplace offering domain purchase, lease-to-own, and negotiation services. It facilitates secure domain transactions with buyer protection and escrow services.
Key services
Premium domain sales, Lease-to-own domain options, Buyer protection and escrow, Domain transfer facilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Stripe, Google Tag Manager, PostHog, Sentry
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure payment processing via Stripe
  • Escrow service for transactions
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
PostHog, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PostHog, Sentry
Marketing tools
PostHog
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a premium domain marketplace offering ssl.lv domain for sale.
  2. No WHOIS data available publicly; domain privacy protection in place.
  3. Secure payment and buyer protection prominently advertised.
  4. Multiple payment options including Apple Pay, Google Pay, PayPal, Visa, Mastercard, Amex.
  5. Lease-to-own payment plans available for domain purchase.
  6. Contact options include chat and email (hello@fruits.co).
  7. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found in content.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  9. Good SEO and metadata with Open Graph and Twitter cards.
  10. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React and Next.js, ensuring server-side rendering and good SEO performance. Payment processing is securely handled by Stripe, with multiple payment options integrated. Analytics and error monitoring are implemented via PostHog and Sentry, supporting operational insights and stability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and secure user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ssl.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ssl.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.