Skip to main content

Security report for srini.ee

SRINI OÜ · Technology · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SRINI OÜ is an Estonian software development company specializing in custom software solutions primarily for government and private sector clients. Founded in 2019, the company operates from Tallinn and Tartu with approximately 80 employees. Their business model focuses on delivering tailored software design, development, and maintenance services, leveraging modern methodologies such as SCRUM and XP. The company has a positive market position supported by government contracts and a spin-off subsidiary, Modena. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, uses Java-based technologies, and integrates Google Analytics and Google Maps APIs. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly but lacks published privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, but missing security headers and incident response contacts are areas for improvement. Overall, SRINI presents a credible and professional digital presence with moderate risk and room for enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching srini.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SRINI targets organizations with ongoing software development needs, including Estonian government agencies and private enterprises. Their competitive advantage lies in a skilled team, employee ownership model, and a focus on innovation, as evidenced by their spin-off company Modena. Revenue streams likely come from project contracts and long-term maintenance agreements. The company demonstrates growth through awards and participation in family-friendly employer programs. Partnerships with government entities and a diverse client base indicate a stable ecosystem. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to strengthen compliance and security posture to align with evolving regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No visible vulnerable libraries or forms collecting sensitive data reduce immediate risk, but improvements in security best practices and formal policies are recommended to enhance resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to meet GDPR and user transparency requirements.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website.
  3. Add a dedicated security or incident response contact email to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance and reduce risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SRINI OÜ
VAT number
EE102059250
Registration number
14449790
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SRINI OÜ
Description
SRINI is a software development company focused on custom software solutions with offices in Tallinn and Tartu. The company employs about 80 people and serves mostly state enterprises and private organizations with ongoing software development needs. SRINI aims to enhance organizational competitiveness through its solutions and has received positive feedback from clients and end-users. The company also has a spin-off named Modena.
Key services
Software design, Software development, Software maintenance and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Java, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, Lottie animations
Frameworks
SCRUM, XP, PAIR PROGRAMMING
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and professional
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. No visible security headers detected, room for improvement
  6. Company has government and private sector clients, indicating trust
  7. No forms detected that collect personal data directly on the site
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Facebook
  9. Good mobile responsiveness and SEO metadata present
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS with custom themes and integrates modern JavaScript libraries such as Lottie for animations. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for user tracking and marketing insights. Google Maps API is embedded for office location display. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting is provided by Elkdata OÜ, consistent with the domain registration. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of formal privacy and cookie management mechanisms, which could impact compliance and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with srini.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review srini.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.