Skip to main content

Security report for squarelovin.com

squarelovin · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

squarelovin is a German-based technology company founded in 2014, operating a leading platform for user-generated content (UGC), influencer marketing, and branded content management. The platform targets brands, marketers, and content creators, offering tools to manage community content effectively and strengthen brand presence. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a professional design and consistent branding, supporting its market position as a key player in the UGC and influencer marketing space. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern web technologies and integrations such as Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive policies and GDPR-aligned consent management. Overall, the website demonstrates a good balance of business credibility, technical implementation, and privacy awareness, positioning squarelovin as a trustworthy and professional platform in its industry.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching squarelovin.com

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention squarelovin.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5,660
Employees
0
Customers
5,660
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
13%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for squarelovin.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

squarelovin operates a platform-as-a-service business model focused on community content management for UGC and influencer marketing. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus on branded content and influencer collaboration, appealing to medium-sized businesses and marketing professionals. The company leverages partnerships with major analytics and marketing providers such as Google, Facebook, and HubSpot, indicating a robust marketing ecosystem. The absence of explicit contact information on the homepage suggests a digital-first approach, possibly relying on inbound leads and platform sign-ups. The domain age and hosting provider align with a stable and legitimate business operation. Growth indicators include active use of advanced marketing tools and a comprehensive cookie consent framework, reflecting awareness of regulatory requirements and user privacy.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent banner providing granular user control, supporting GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating potential gaps in transparency around security governance. The use of reputable hosting (Hetzner) and DNS (Cloudflare) services adds to the security robustness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced header policies and published incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to increase transparency and user trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Consider adding clear business contact information on the website to improve credibility and user support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
squarelovin
Description
Entdecke squarelovin, die führende Community Content Management Plattform für UGC, Influencer Marketing & Branded Content. Stärke deine Marke jetzt!
Key services
UGC management, Influencer marketing, Branded content platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8, Elementor 3.28.4, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, jQuery 3.7.1, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent banner with granular controls is implemented
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage
  4. Privacy policy and cookie policy are present and comprehensive
  5. No terms of service page detected
  6. Use of modern WordPress CMS with Elementor builder
  7. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics integrations detected
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  10. No business contact information clearly displayed on homepage
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building, indicating a flexible and widely supported infrastructure. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy management, reflecting a mature digital marketing setup. Hosting is provided by Hetzner Online GmbH with DNS managed via Cloudflare, ensuring reliable performance and security. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts and tracking pixels. Accessibility is basic, suggesting potential for improvement in inclusive design. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with opportunities for optimization in performance and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with squarelovin.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review squarelovin.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.