Skip to main content

Security report for spribe.io

Spribe OÜ · Technology · Estonia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Spribe OÜ is a technology company specializing in the development of innovative casino games for the iGaming industry. Their product portfolio includes next-generation, provably fair games such as Aviator, Turbo Games, Poker, Skill Games, and Slots, targeting online casino operators and players. The company positions itself as a pioneer in smart gaming technology with a focus on transparency and player engagement. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, supported by licensing from the UK Gambling Commission and hosting on Amazon Web Services, indicating a reliable and compliant business operation. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including Angular 15 and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user behavior tracking. Hosting on AWS provides a robust infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics, although some security headers are not explicitly detected. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no explicit terms of service or security policy pages were found. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses domain transfer protection. The use of provably fair cryptography enhances trust in game fairness. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies to strengthen security posture. No critical vulnerabilities or WAF blocking were detected. Overall, Spribe's website demonstrates a mature digital presence with good business credibility and moderate to good security practices. The site is safe for adult users interested in online casino gaming. Strategic improvements in security transparency and policy disclosures would further enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spribe.io

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
35
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Spribe operates in the competitive iGaming technology sector, focusing on innovative casino game development with a unique selling proposition of provably fair gaming. Their business model revolves around licensing games and engagement tools to online casinos, targeting a tech-savvy and regulated market. The company benefits from strategic partnerships and licensing, such as the UK Gambling Commission license, which supports market access and regulatory compliance. The presence of social media channels and news updates indicates active marketing and growth efforts. Revenue streams likely include game licensing fees and platform integrations. The company’s Estonia base aligns with a strong European gaming technology ecosystem. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent operation. The company’s digital maturity is reflected in its modern tech stack and AWS hosting, though there is room for enhanced security policy transparency.

Security posture

Spribe’s security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection in place. The use of provably fair cryptography technology is a strong security and trust indicator for the gaming industry. However, the absence of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information is published, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. The website uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager, which require careful privacy management to ensure GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found in the content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with clear areas for improvement in policy publication and technical headers.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and cookie management practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spribe OÜ
Description
Spribe offers next generation, engaging games for the iGaming industry, including innovative casino games such as Aviator, Turbo Games, Poker, Skill Games, and Slots.
Key services
Casino game development, Provably fair gaming technology, Engagement tools and promo mechanics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 15, Google Analytics, AWS Hosting
Frameworks
Angular
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Provably Fair cryptography technology

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is focused on innovative casino games with provably fair technology.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanism.
  5. No explicit terms of service page detected.
  6. Security headers are not explicitly visible in the HTML content.
  7. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  8. Hosting is on AWS, indicating reliable infrastructure.
  9. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Facebook.
  10. Licensed by UK Gambling Commission, enhancing trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Angular 15, a modern and widely supported web framework, ensuring a responsive and dynamic user experience. Hosting on Amazon Web Services provides scalable and reliable infrastructure. The site includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and mobile optimization is good. SEO practices are adequate with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and semantic HTML. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or framework-based site. The site lacks some security headers which could be added to reduce technical risks. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and well-maintained with opportunities for security and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spribe.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spribe.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.