Skip to main content

Security report for sportsdatacampus.com

Sports Data Campus · Education · Spain

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sports Data Campus is a specialized educational organization focused on advanced analytics, Big Data, and technology applied to football and sports. Founded in 2020 and based in Valladolid, Spain, it positions itself as a leading international campus for specialized training in sports data analytics. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and integrates WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities. It employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight for marketing and analytics. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact information via structured data. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are not evident. Privacy compliance is lacking as no privacy or cookie policies are found, and no consent mechanisms are implemented. Overall, the site is professional and credible but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sportsdatacampus.com

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets professionals and students interested in sports analytics and Big Data, offering educational and training services. Its business model revolves around specialized courses and training programs in sports technology and analytics. The market position is strong within its niche, leveraging international expertise and a focused curriculum. The website content and structured data reinforce the business identity and location. The absence of privacy and cookie policies may impact trust with privacy-conscious users. The use of WooCommerce suggests potential revenue from course sales or related products. The company appears small but focused, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, which protects against unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, which are recommended best practices. There is no visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy, limiting transparency for security researchers. Tracking technologies are present without visible cookie consent, which may conflict with GDPR requirements. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing DNSSEC, security headers, and privacy compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security
  4. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels to minimize privacy risks and improve transparency

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sports Data Campus
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sports Data Campus
Description
Los principales profesionales del Big Data y la tecnología aplicada al Deporte, a nivel internacional, se suman al Sports Data Campus para contribuir a crear el Mayor Campus de Formación especializada en Analítica Avanzada aplicada al Fútbol, Big Data y Tecnología deportiva del mundo.
Key services
Advanced analytics training, Big Data education, Sports technology education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Fonts from Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Divi Theme Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
PixelYourSite
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed using WordPress and Divi theme
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage or in metadata
  3. Contact information is clearly provided via structured data
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  5. HTTPS is enabled and domain status prevents unauthorized transfers
  6. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity
  7. Tracking pixels from LinkedIn and Google Tag Manager are present without visible cookie consent mechanism
  8. Content is in Spanish and focused on sports data analytics education
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and widely used CMS platform, WordPress, with the Divi theme providing a flexible and professional design. WooCommerce integration indicates e-commerce capabilities. The site uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight for analytics and marketing. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but some technical debt from extensive CSS and JS. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced. The hosting provider is likely IONOS SE, consistent with the registrar information. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sportsdatacampus.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sportsdatacampus.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.