Skip to main content

Security report for sportradar.com

Sportradar · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sportradar is a leading global sports technology company specializing in delivering sports data, content, and analytics to media companies, sports federations, and the betting industry. Established in 1998, it holds a strong market position as a trusted provider at the intersection of sports, media, and betting. The company operates a professional and well-branded website that reflects its enterprise scale and technological sophistication. The website leverages WordPress CMS with advanced performance optimizations and integrates modern analytics and consent management tools, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and domain protection, though there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and enabling DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks a clearly accessible privacy policy and terms of service. Overall, Sportradar presents a credible and professional online presence aligned with its business model and industry.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of sportradar.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sportradar.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
70
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sportradar.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,373
Employees
50
Customers
1,759
Third parties
564
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2026-06-08 · 76 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for sportradar.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sts.sportradar.com2026-06-08
  • –sts.sportradar.com2026-06-01
  • –sts.sportradar.com2026-05-27
  • –sts.sportradar.com2026-05-21
  • –sts.sportradar.com2026-05-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sportradar operates primarily in the technology sector, focusing on sports data and media services. Its business model is B2B, targeting media companies, sports federations, and betting operators. The company’s long domain age and consistent registration data support its established market presence. Key services include sports data delivery, content provision, and betting-related technology solutions. The website’s integration with multiple analytics and marketing tools suggests an active engagement in digital marketing and user behavior analysis. Social media presence on major platforms further supports brand visibility and trust. No direct contact information or detailed corporate disclosures were found in the analyzed content, which is typical for enterprise B2B companies relying on contact forms and partner channels.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status locks to prevent unauthorized domain changes, indicating good baseline security practices. Cookie consent is managed via a recognized third-party tool (Truendo), supporting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security robustness. No explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no published security policy or incident response information, which are areas for improvement. The use of reputable plugins and analytics services reduces risk from vulnerable libraries, but continuous monitoring is recommended. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage or footer.
  2. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Add security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sportradar
Description
Sportradar is the world’s leading sports technology company, at the intersection between sports, media and betting.
Key services
sports data delivery, content services, media solutions, betting industry services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, NitroPack, Truendo Cookie Consent, Google Fonts, Nitro CDN, Piwik PRO Analytics
Frameworks
WPML (WordPress Multilingual), Gravity Forms
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited
  • Cookie consent management implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Piwik PRO
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik PRO
Marketing tools
Truendo Cookie Consent, Piwik PRO Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern technologies and CMS (WordPress) with performance optimization (NitroPack).
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with granular control via Truendo.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage HTML content.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML content.
  5. Social media links to Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn are present and verified.
  6. Forms are implemented using Gravity Forms plugin with AJAX and reCAPTCHA support.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  8. Domain is well maintained with long registration period and protective domain status.
  9. No signs of adult or NSFW content; content is business and technology focused.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with advanced performance optimization via NitroPack and uses Gravity Forms for data collection. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Piwik PRO for analytics, indicating a sophisticated tracking and marketing setup. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Hosting and domain registration are managed through Amazon Registrar and AWS DNS services, ensuring reliable infrastructure. The site uses multiple external resources including Google Fonts and CDN services. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. The technical implementation supports a fast, secure, and user-friendly experience suitable for an enterprise-level sports technology company.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100 −1Medium31 findingsView report
  2. 72/100 +19Medium30 findingsView report
  3. 53/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sportradar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sportradar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.