Skip to main content

Security report for sportradar.com

Sportradar · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sportradar is a globally recognized sports technology company specializing in delivering sports data and content to media companies, sports federations, and the betting industry. Established in 1998, it holds a strong market position as a leader in sports data services, integrating technology at the intersection of sports, media, and betting. The company targets B2B clients requiring reliable and comprehensive sports data solutions. Technically, Sportradar's website is built on WordPress CMS, enhanced with performance optimizations like NitroPack and multilingual support via WPML. The site employs modern tracking and consent management tools such as Google Tag Manager, Piwik PRO, and Truendo CMP, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are well implemented, contributing to a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status protections to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and explicit security headers are not detected, indicating room for improvement. Consent management for cookies is implemented, but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service were found in the analyzed content, which could impact compliance and user trust. Overall, Sportradar presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with a strong business model and technical foundation. Strategic enhancements in security headers, explicit privacy documentation, and DNSSEC implementation would further strengthen its security posture and compliance standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sportradar.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
70
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sportradar.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,373
Employees
50
Customers
1,759
Third parties
564
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2026-06-08 · 76 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for sportradar.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sts.sportradar.com2026-06-08
  • –sts.sportradar.com2026-06-01
  • –sts.sportradar.com2026-05-27
  • –sts.sportradar.com2026-05-21
  • –sts.sportradar.com2026-05-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sportradar operates as an essential entity in the sports technology sector, providing critical data and content services to media and betting industries. Its long domain age and consistent registration details support its established market presence. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with major platforms and tracking services, indicating a robust ecosystem. Its business model focuses on B2B services, with key revenue streams likely from data licensing, integrity services, and technology solutions. The absence of direct contact information on the main page suggests a focus on enterprise clients who engage through dedicated channels. The website's multilingual capabilities and global DNS hosting reflect international operations and scalability.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections in place. The use of consent management tools aligns with GDPR requirements, though the lack of explicit privacy and security policies is a compliance gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers like CSP or HSTS reduces the overall security score. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly visible, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Overall, Sportradar's security posture is solid but would benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main website.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  4. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sportradar
Description
Sportradar is the world’s leading sports technology company, at the intersection between sports, media and betting.
Key services
Sports data delivery, Content provision, Integrity services, Betting solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, NitroPack, Truendo CMP, Google Fonts, AWS DNS hosting
Frameworks
WPML (WordPress Multilingual), Gravity Forms
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited domain status
  • Consent management implemented for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Piwik PRO
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik PRO
Marketing tools
Truendo Consent Management Platform
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with performance optimization via NitroPack.
  2. Consent management is implemented using Truendo CMP, indicating GDPR awareness.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page HTML content.
  4. Multiple social media official links are present, enhancing trust.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the main HTML content.
  6. Forms are implemented using Gravity Forms plugin, with AJAX and reCAPTCHA integration.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  9. Website is well-structured with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with advanced plugins like Gravity Forms for data collection and WPML for multilingual support. Performance is optimized using NitroPack, and fonts are loaded efficiently via Google Fonts. Tracking and analytics are managed through Google Tag Manager and Piwik PRO, integrated with a consent management platform (Truendo CMP) to comply with privacy regulations. The hosting and DNS are managed via Amazon Registrar, indicating reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, with structured data enhancing search engine understanding. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and DNSSEC would reduce risk and modernize the security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium30 findingsView report
  2. 72/100 +19Medium30 findingsView report
  3. 53/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sportradar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sportradar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.