Skip to main content

Security report for sport80.com

Sport:80 USA Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sport:80 USA Inc. operates a market-leading cloud-based sports management platform designed specifically for National Governing Bodies and sports organizations. Their platform offers comprehensive features including membership management, certification tracking, event registration, CRM, compliance, and finance management. The company positions itself as an innovator in sports technology with a strong client base of over 80 NGBs and sports organizations, primarily in the USA and UK. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with extensive content and client testimonials supporting their market position. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, ensuring good digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though the absence of visible security headers and a vulnerability disclosure page suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data is a concern but is mitigated by the presence of certifications and transparent contact information. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-designed, and business-focused, with a moderate to high security and privacy compliance level.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sport80.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sport:80 targets a niche market of sports governing bodies and organizations, offering a SaaS platform that centralizes sports business management functions. Their competitive advantage lies in their specialized feature set tailored to sports industry needs and a strong partnership ecosystem including SafeSport and Memberwise. Revenue likely derives from subscription fees and bolt-on solutions. The company demonstrates growth through client testimonials and continuous platform development. Their marketing strategy includes content hubs, case studies, and a clear call to action for demos. The partnership with recognized certification bodies and awards enhances credibility and market trust. The company’s operations appear focused on the US market with a UK presence, supported by localized content and alternate site versions.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, indicating a mature privacy approach. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of reputable third-party analytics and tag managers is balanced with user consent controls. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The site’s security score is good but could be elevated by adopting additional best practices and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader compliance and usability.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to minimize risk from vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sport:80 USA Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sport:80 USA Inc.
Description
Sport:80 provides a revolutionary sports technology platform that goes beyond membership management and CRM, offering a complete sports business management software for National Governing Bodies (NGBs) and sports organizations.
Key services
Membership Management, Certification Management, Event Registration, CRM & Contact Management, Data Management & Reporting, Coaches & Workforce Management, Governance & Compliance, Marketing & Communications, Customer Support Center, Payments & Finance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, CookieControl by Civic UK, Slick Carousel
Platforms
Cloud-based SaaS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable third-party analytics and tag managers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM), LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight, Google Analytics via GTM
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong branding and consistent design across pages.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented.
  4. Multiple certifications and awards displayed enhancing trust.
  5. No visible security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  7. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools with consent.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Slick Carousel for UI components. The site is cloud-hosted with a responsive design optimized for mobile devices. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD data for organization and contact information. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts to reduce blocking. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and accessibility could enhance robustness. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found, and domain WHOIS data is missing, which should be investigated for operational assurance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sport80.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sport80.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.