Skip to main content

Security report for split.io

Harness Inc. · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Harness Inc. is a leading enterprise software company specializing in feature management and experimentation solutions that enable software development teams to release faster and safer. Their platform integrates feature flags, release monitoring, and experimentation capabilities to empower engineering and product teams to innovate with confidence. Harness targets large enterprises and software teams seeking to improve software delivery velocity and quality through data-driven feature rollout and testing. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, JavaScript frameworks, and Rive animations, with integrations for analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Marketo. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, reflecting a mature digital presence. From a security perspective, Harness enforces HTTPS, employs cookie consent mechanisms, and maintains comprehensive privacy and security policies. However, explicit security headers and public vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not clearly visible, suggesting areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for SaaS companies, and the domain appears legitimate based on website content and branding. Overall, Harness presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically sound online presence with strong business credibility. Strategic recommendations include enhancing public security disclosures, improving security header implementation, and providing clearer incident response contacts to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of split.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching split.io

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Harness operates in the competitive SaaS market for DevOps and software delivery tools, focusing on feature flag management and experimentation. Their business model is subscription-based with tiered plans catering to teams and enterprises. The company leverages partnerships with Split.io and Traceable.ai to expand its product ecosystem. Customer testimonials and logos from major enterprises like Adobe, Salesforce, and SAP indicate strong market positioning and adoption. Harness emphasizes developer-friendly SDKs and integrations, targeting software engineers, product managers, and DevOps professionals. Growth indicators include recent acquisitions and financing announcements. The company maintains a strong content marketing strategy with blogs, ebooks, and training resources to support customer engagement and education.

Security posture

Harness demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, privacy policies aligned with GDPR, and cookie consent mechanisms. The presence of a dedicated security page indicates organizational focus on security governance. However, the absence of a public vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file and limited visible security headers suggest opportunities to enhance transparency and incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the website content. The security score is strong but could be improved by adopting additional best practices and public disclosures. Overall, Harness appears to maintain a secure environment appropriate for enterprise SaaS offerings.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a public vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and encourage responsible reporting.
  2. Implement and explicitly advertise security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information on the security or legal pages to facilitate communication in case of security events.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
  5. Enhance user trust by including certifications or compliance badges if applicable, and update the website with these credentials.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Harness Inc.
Description
Harness provides feature management and experimentation software enabling teams to release with feature flags connected to critical impact data, facilitating safer, faster, and more impactful software delivery.
Key services
Feature Flags, Release Monitoring, Experimentation, SDKs for multiple platforms, Integrations with analytics and monitoring tools
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Rive animations, Google Tag Manager, Webflow CMS, Finsweet CMS attributes, Marketo Forms
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for script management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent mechanism for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Marketo Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Strong branding and consistent messaging around feature management and experimentation
  3. Multiple SDKs and integrations indicate mature product offering
  4. Comprehensive FAQ structured data present for user assistance
  5. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Webflow)
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms
  7. No direct company emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
  8. Contact primarily via forms and sales contact pages
  9. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and Rive animations for interactive content. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tag management, and Marketo for form handling and lead capture. The site is well-structured with comprehensive metadata, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data for SEO and rich search results. Performance is optimized with lazy loading of images and responsive design. The technical stack supports a fast, accessible, and mobile-friendly user experience. Hosting appears to be managed via Identity Digital or a similar provider. There is no indication of technical debt or legacy technology usage, indicating a modern and maintainable infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100 −2Low28 findingsView report
  2. 78/100 +2Low28 findingsView report
  3. 76/100Low22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with split.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review split.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.