Skip to main content

Security report for splashthat.com

Splash · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Splash is a mature, enterprise-focused event marketing platform that enables companies to design, manage, and measure live, virtual, and hybrid events. The platform offers a comprehensive suite of services including event design, guest management, ticketing, email marketing, virtual venues, attendance insights, and integrations with major CRM and marketing automation platforms. The website reflects a strong market position with consistent branding, extensive customer testimonials, and integration with trusted third-party tools. Technically, the site is built on modern web technologies such as Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, and uses advanced analytics tools including Adobe Analytics and Google Tag Manager. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and policies are not fully visible. The domain WHOIS data confirms a long-standing, legitimate registration consistent with the business's maturity. Overall, the website demonstrates a professional, trustworthy presence with room for improvement in privacy and security policy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching splashthat.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Splash operates in the technology sector, specifically SaaS for event marketing and management. It targets enterprise and mid-market companies seeking to optimize event-led growth strategies. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with a focus on integrations to CRM and marketing platforms, enhancing pipeline and revenue generation from events. The company leverages partnerships with major platforms like Salesforce, Marketo, HubSpot, and Slack. Customer testimonials and third-party reviews indicate strong user satisfaction and competitive advantages in scalability, design, and data integration. The presence of a parent company, Cvent, suggests a robust backing and expanded market reach. Strategic observations include a focus on hybrid and virtual event formats, reflecting market trends and growth opportunities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of a reputable cookie consent management system (OneTrust). No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could be addressed to enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, indicating an area for improvement in responsible disclosure practices. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be strengthened by publishing clear policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages linked prominently on the website.
  2. Implement and configure HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and integrations to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Splash
Description
Splash's event marketing platform helps companies market, manage, and measure their live, virtual, and hybrid event programs. All on one platform.
Key services
Event Design, Guest Management, Ticketing, Invites and Reminders, Virtual Venue, Attendance Insights, On-Site Tools, Integrations, Reporting, Team Management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Inter), OneTrust Cookie Consent, Adobe Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Bizible, Chili Piper Concierge, Finsweet Components, Lottie animations, jQuery
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
AWS (DNS via AWS Route53), GoDaddy Registrar
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of OneTrust for cookie consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with validation
  • Use of reputable analytics and marketing scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Bizible
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Analytics, Bizible
Marketing tools
OneTrust, Chili Piper, Adobe Analytics, Bizible
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional event marketing SaaS platform targeting enterprise clients.
  2. Strong branding and consistent design throughout site.
  3. Multiple customer testimonials and third-party review references increase trust.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. Cookie consent implemented via OneTrust.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service links found in provided HTML.
  7. Contact information primarily via demo request form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  9. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS hosted likely on AWS infrastructure, leveraging modern front-end technologies including Google Fonts and Lottie animations for enhanced user experience. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Adobe Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Bizible, and Chili Piper Concierge, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Performance is optimized with fast loading times and excellent mobile responsiveness. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced with explicit ARIA roles and labels. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph images. The technical stack is modern and well maintained, supporting the business's enterprise-grade service offerings. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and policy disclosures to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with splashthat.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review splashthat.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.