Skip to main content

Security report for spirit55555.dk

Technology · Denmark

Partial score · DNS & email only

71/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website spirit55555.dk is a personal professional portfolio for Anders G. Jørgensen, a technology professional based in Copenhagen, Denmark, working at One.com. The site highlights his personal projects related to Minecraft server tools and provides contact information and social media links. The business model is personal branding and showcasing technical expertise. The site is small scale and targets a general audience interested in technology and gaming tools. Technically, the website uses modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap and FontAwesome delivered via CDN, hosted on One.com. The site is mobile optimized with a clean and consistent design, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. No CMS or analytics tools are detected, indicating a lightweight and privacy-conscious setup. From a security perspective, the site lacks several best practices such as DNSSEC, security headers, and privacy or cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The domain is well established since 2007, registered with a reputable registrar, and consistent with the website content, indicating legitimacy. No WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected. Overall, the site is safe and professional but could improve its security posture and privacy compliance. The risk level is low given the limited data collection and personal nature of the site. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policies, and DNS security would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spirit55555.dk

This scan found 8 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
95
DNS health
75
Network security
40
Average
71

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention spirit55555.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for spirit55555.dk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents an individual technology professional with a niche focus on Minecraft server tools. The market positioning is as a personal brand and developer portfolio rather than a commercial enterprise. Revenue streams are not explicit but likely indirect through reputation and professional opportunities. The target customers are technology enthusiasts and Minecraft server administrators. The site shows moderate growth indicators through active social media and project links. Partnerships are limited to employment at One.com. The business operates in the technology sector with a small scale footprint and no subsidiaries or parent companies.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is basic. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates room for improvement in protecting against DNS spoofing and common web attacks. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR best practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which limits transparency and preparedness. However, the site does not collect sensitive data or use forms, reducing exposure. The domain registration is consistent and trustworthy, mitigating risks related to domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a personal site but not suitable for handling sensitive or regulated data.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to increase transparency and trust.
  5. Consider HTTPS enforcement and regular security audits to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal website of Anders G. Jørgensen, a 33-year-old living in Copenhagen, working at One.com, creator of mcsrvstat.us and mctools.org
Key services
creator of Minecraft server status and tools websites
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap Dark 5, FontAwesome 5.15.4, Bootstrap 5.1.3
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Personal website with professional focus
  2. No privacy or cookie policies present
  3. No security policies or incident response information
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected
  5. Uses modern frontend libraries with CDN delivery
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  7. Contact information limited to email and social media
  8. No phone numbers or physical addresses provided
  9. No security headers detected in provided data
  10. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap Dark 5 and FontAwesome icons, delivered via CDN for performance. Hosting is provided by One.com, consistent with the registrant data. The site is mobile responsive and has a clean, consistent design. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimizations minimal. No CMS or analytics tools are detected, indicating a simple static or lightweight site. Performance is moderate, likely due to CDN usage and minimal external dependencies. There is no evidence of technical debt or legacy technologies. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and SEO for better reach and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spirit55555.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spirit55555.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.