Skip to main content

Security report for spekas.lt

Technology · Lithuania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

28/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website spekas.lt is a minimal informational page primarily serving as a status or access point for hosting customers, linking to a web console hosted at partnet.lt. The business appears to be a small hosting service provider targeting existing clients who need self-service access. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on simple HTML and CSS without modern frameworks or CMS. The site lacks mobile optimization, accessibility features, and SEO enhancements. Security posture is weak, with no HTTPS detected and no security headers present. Privacy compliance is absent, with no privacy or cookie policies found. Contact information is minimal and contains a typographical error in the email link. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust assessment. Overall, the site is functional but lacks professionalism, security, and compliance maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spekas.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
28

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind spekas.lt appears to be a small-scale hosting service provider, likely operating in Lithuania, given the domain and language. The market positioning is unclear due to minimal content and lack of branding. The business model focuses on providing hosting services with self-service management via a web console. Revenue streams and growth indicators are not discernible from the site. The partnership with partnet.lt suggests reliance on an external hosting provider. The lack of detailed business information and trust indicators limits competitive advantage and market presence visibility.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak. The absence of HTTPS is a critical vulnerability, exposing users to potential interception and data tampering. No security headers are implemented, increasing risk of clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and other attacks. No privacy or cookie policies indicate non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security policy information are missing, reducing readiness for security events. The minimal content and lack of forms reduce attack surface but also limit user trust. Overall, the site requires urgent security improvements to protect users and comply with regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publish privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Correct the email link typo to ensure users can contact support reliably.
  5. Improve website design for mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be a basic informational page indicating operational status and providing access to a web console for self-service hosting management.
Key services
Hosting service self-management via web console
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is minimalistic with very limited content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact email provided but with a typo in mailto link ('maito:' instead of 'mailto:').
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible from provided data.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded, limiting domain trust assessment.
  8. Website likely serves as a status or informational page for hosting customers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and CSS without any detected JavaScript frameworks or CMS. The hosting provider is likely partnet.lt, inferred from the web console link. The site lacks modern technical features such as responsive design, SEO meta tags, and accessibility attributes. Performance is likely moderate given the simplicity but could be improved with optimization. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts indicates minimal data collection. Technical debt is low due to simplicity but modernization is recommended to improve security, usability, and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spekas.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spekas.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.