Skip to main content

Security report for sparcopen.org

SPARC · Education · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SPARC is a well-established non-profit organization dedicated to advancing open access, open data, and open education globally. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content targeting researchers, educators, and policy makers. It serves as a resource hub and advocacy platform, promoting open knowledge sharing as a human right. The organization maintains a consistent brand identity and offers key services including policy advocacy, educational resources, and community engagement. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and jQuery, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, and uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. While performance and mobile optimization are good, some technical improvements are recommended such as updating outdated libraries and enabling DNSSEC. Security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adding security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is mostly addressed with a clear privacy policy and terms of use, though cookie consent mechanisms are absent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and aligned with its mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sparcopen.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention sparcopen.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for sparcopen.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SPARC occupies a strong position in the education and open access advocacy sector, leveraging a membership-based non-profit model. Its market advantage lies in its global recognition and comprehensive resources supporting open knowledge initiatives. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, grants, and donations. The target audience includes academic institutions, researchers, and policy makers interested in open science and education. The organization actively engages through events, news, and impact stories, fostering a collaborative ecosystem. Partnerships with major platforms and social media presence enhance its outreach. The domain age and WHOIS data support legitimacy and continuity. Strategic growth could focus on expanding digital engagement and enhancing compliance frameworks.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represent gaps that could be exploited. The use of an outdated jQuery version introduces potential vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which may hinder rapid response to threats. Data protection practices appear sound with anti-spam honeypot fields in forms, but cookie consent is missing, which could affect GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit but would benefit from enhancements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Update jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  5. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SPARC
Description
SPARC is a global organization committed to making Open the default mode for all research and education, empowering people to solve big problems and make new discoveries through the adoption of Open Access, Open Data, and Open Education.
Key services
Advocacy for open access policies, Educational resources and webinars, Membership and community building, Policy development and support, Events and news dissemination
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap 3.3.5, jQuery 1.9.1, Font Awesome 4.4.0, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientDeleteProhibited domain status
  • Use of Cloudflare nameservers
  • Honeypot anti-spam fields in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Simple Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Simple Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained
  2. Content is comprehensive and focused on open access and education advocacy
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  4. Use of privacy protection in WHOIS is justified and common for this sector
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected which may be a compliance gap
  6. Security headers are missing or not detected, improvement recommended
  7. Use of older jQuery version is a minor security concern
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap 3.3.5 and jQuery 1.9.1, indicating a somewhat dated but stable technology stack. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS services, enhancing availability and some security aspects. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially by updating libraries and leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks. Accessibility and SEO are well addressed with proper meta tags, structured data (JSON-LD), and responsive design. Technical debt is present in the form of older dependencies and missing DNSSEC. Modernization opportunities include upgrading to newer Bootstrap and jQuery versions and implementing advanced security controls to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sparcopen.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sparcopen.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.