Skip to main content

Security report for spacebear.ee

Spacebear OÜ · Technology · Estonia

High risk. 19 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Spacebear OÜ is a small Estonian technology company specializing in DevOps solutions, providing tools and expertise to help companies deliver reliable software faster. Their key services include container registries, CI/CD pipelines, infrastructure as code, and automated application monitoring. The company targets businesses seeking to improve their software delivery processes through modern DevOps practices. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and a focus on technology services. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, styled with Tailwind CSS, and hosted on bunny.net infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. No major technical issues or vulnerabilities are evident from the HTML content. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security headers, a security policy, incident response information, and a cookie consent mechanism, which are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is consistent with the company’s location and founding date, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front with room for enhancement in privacy compliance and security posture to better align with industry best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

19 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MSSQL

      Port 1433 (MSSQL) is publicly accessible - MSSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MSSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Oracle

      Port 1521 (Oracle) is publicly accessible - Oracle - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Oracle using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching spacebear.ee

This scan found 36 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
55
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
50
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Spacebear OÜ operates in the technology sector with a focus on DevOps tooling and consulting. Their business model is B2B, targeting companies needing reliable software delivery solutions. The company appears to be small-sized, founded in 2018, and based in Estonia. They maintain a professional online presence with clear contact details and a linked company registration number, which enhances credibility. Their partnership with spacebearstatus.com for system status indicates operational transparency. The absence of social media links suggests a focused, possibly niche market approach. No certifications or formal security frameworks are advertised, which could be a growth area. The company’s offerings align with current market demands for DevOps automation and infrastructure management.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data leaks are visible. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and preparedness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which is a missed opportunity for responsible vulnerability management. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are detected, the security posture would benefit from implementing standard security headers, formal policies, and privacy compliance mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response information page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Introduce a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security culture.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimizations to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Spacebear OÜ
Registration number
14471594
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spacebear OÜ
Description
Providing companies with tools and expertise to deliver more reliable software faster, specializing in DevOps solutions.
Key services
Container Registry, CI/CD Pipelines, Infrastructure as Code, Automated Application Monitoring
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Tailwind CSS
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional and consistent branding with clear company identity.
  3. Contact information is complete and clearly presented.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in HTML content.
  7. No social media links present on the homepage or footer.
  8. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
  9. No visible forms collecting user data except mailto link for scheduling meetings.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js stack with Tailwind CSS for styling, indicating a contemporary and maintainable codebase. Hosting on bunny.net suggests reliable CDN and performance capabilities. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured, though accessibility is basic and SEO could be improved with richer metadata and structured data. No CMS is detected, implying a custom or static site approach. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts indicates minimal user tracking, which aligns with privacy-conscious design. Performance is moderate, likely benefiting from CDN usage but could be optimized further. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but has opportunities for enhancement in SEO, accessibility, and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with spacebear.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review spacebear.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.