Skip to main content

Security report for sovra.io

Domains By Proxy, LLC · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sovra.io is a technology platform focused on providing decentralized identity, verifiable credentials, and privacy-first web3 infrastructure aimed at connecting governments, developers, and citizens. The company positions itself as a digital trust enabler in the intelligent age, targeting institutional legitimacy and scalable web3 solutions. The website is professionally designed using Framer and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. The domain is newly registered in 2024 and uses privacy protection services, which is typical for startups in early stages. Technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies and Cloudflare DNS, with HTTPS enabled and basic security practices in place. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and incident response details, which are important for compliance and trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and security headers. The site content is safe and appropriate for a general audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sovra.io

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sovra operates in the technology sector with a focus on government and institutional clients, leveraging decentralized identity and web3 infrastructure. The business model appears to be platform-based, offering services that enable digital trust and verifiable credentials. The company targets a niche market of governments, developers, and citizens interested in privacy-first digital identity solutions. The domain age and privacy protection suggest a startup or early-stage company. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The use of Google Analytics indicates some level of user engagement tracking, but lack of privacy policies may impact user trust. The company branding is consistent and professional, supporting a credible market position in emerging web3 technologies.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and domain status locks that prevent unauthorized domain transfers or deletions. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates a gap in security governance and transparency. The integration of Google Analytics without a cookie consent mechanism raises privacy compliance concerns. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices in security headers, policy publication, and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and build user trust.
  3. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to inform users about tracking and obtain consent.
  4. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Provide clear contact information including incident response and vulnerability disclosure channels.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Domains By Proxy, LLC
Description
Sovra connects governments, developers, and citizens through decentralized identity, verifiable credentials, and privacy-first web3 infrastructure. We make digital trust usable, web3 scalable, and institutions legitimate in the intelligent age.
Key services
Decentralized identity, Verifiable credentials, Privacy-first web3 infrastructure
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer (site generator), Google Analytics, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections
  • No DNSSEC enabled (recommend enabling)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed using Framer
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed
  4. Uses Google Analytics for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism
  5. Domain is new and privacy protected
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Framer, a modern web design and development platform, and is hosted likely on Framer's or Cloudflare's infrastructure. It uses Google Analytics for tracking and includes standard meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. The domain uses GoDaddy as registrar with privacy protection enabled. No CMS other than Framer was detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sovra.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sovra.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.