Skip to main content

Security report for solvas.uz

ООО “Solvas” · Technology · Uzbekistan

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ООО “Solvas” operates as a regional branch of ALSO Holding AG, focusing on delivering Microsoft cloud solutions and related services in Uzbekistan and the broader EMEA region. The website presents a professional business offering including licensing, support, and integration of Microsoft products such as Microsoft 365, Azure, and Dynamics. The company leverages its parent group's extensive network and expertise to provide localized support and advanced cloud technologies. Technically, the website uses a proprietary CMS with modern but somewhat dated JavaScript libraries and frameworks, ensuring a functional and responsive user experience. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and a consent management platform. Security posture is adequate but could be improved by adding explicit security headers and publishing incident response information. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the strong corporate branding and contact information support legitimacy. Overall, the site is a credible, business-focused platform with room for technical and security enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching solvas.uz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention solvas.uz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for solvas.uz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Solvas positions itself as a key Microsoft cloud solutions distributor in Uzbekistan, backed by the ALSO group, a major player in the EMEA region. Its business model centers on cloud product licensing, subscription management, and integration services targeting enterprises and partners. The company benefits from a strong partnership ecosystem, including Microsoft and a network of European experts. The website content and contact channels indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a focus on technology and cloud services. Marketing tools like Marketo and Usercentrics suggest a mature approach to lead generation and privacy compliance. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a minor concern but does not detract significantly from the business credibility given the corporate context.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage and a consent management platform ensuring GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and no published security or incident response policies were found. The use of some outdated JavaScript libraries could pose vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt file and incident response contacts limits transparency for vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a business site but could be strengthened by adopting best practices in HTTP security headers, updating dependencies, and publishing clear security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Regularly update JavaScript libraries and frameworks to their latest secure versions.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ООО “Solvas”
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ООО “Solvas”
Description
ООО “Solvas” is part of the ALSO group, a leading Microsoft cloud solutions provider in EMEA. They offer partners smart and reliable cloud technology solutions for modern workplaces, collaboration, AI, cybersecurity, and more.
Key services
Microsoft 365, Copilot, Teams, Azure, Dynamics licensing and support, Billing and subscription management, Microsoft Security Report & Azure Fraud Protection, API integration for e-commerce systems, Local support office in Tashkent
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.3, Modernizr 2.8.3, Bootstrap 3.3.4, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Video.js, Usercentrics CMP, Marketo Forms
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Vimeo (video hosting)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Consent management platform for GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics CMP, Marketo Forms
Marketing tools
Marketo Forms, Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Russian language targeting Uzbekistan region.
  2. Strong branding alignment with ALSO Holding AG and Microsoft partnership.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with active consent management.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including physical address, email, phone, and contact form.
  5. No security.txt or explicit incident response contacts found.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is business and technology focused.
  8. Modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks used but some are outdated versions.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content; SSL status unknown but URL is HTTPS.
  10. Marketing tools include Marketo and Usercentrics for forms and consent management.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a proprietary CMS platform (cms5) with a technology stack including jQuery 2.1.3, Modernizr 2.8.3, Bootstrap 3.3.4, and Font Awesome 4.7.0. Video content is hosted on Vimeo, and marketing integrations include Marketo Forms and Usercentrics for consent management. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured content. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements by updating libraries and optimizing assets. Accessibility is basic and could be enhanced. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but shows signs of aging components that should be modernized to reduce technical debt and security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with solvas.uz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review solvas.uz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.