Skip to main content

Security report for soloist.ai

DNStination Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Soloist.ai is a technology startup founded in 2023 by DNStination Inc., based in the US. The company offers a free AI-powered website creation platform targeting small business owners and entrepreneurs who want to launch their business websites quickly and easily. The platform emphasizes simplicity and the ability to connect custom domains for free, positioning itself as an emerging player in the AI website creation market. The website is professionally designed with modern frameworks such as Next.js and Bootstrap, indicating a mature technical infrastructure for a young company. Hosting appears to leverage Akamai's DNS infrastructure, suggesting reliable performance and security at the network level. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections in place, but lacks advanced DNS security features like DNSSEC and visible security policies on the site. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies, which is a risk area for regulatory compliance. Overall, the website is functional, safe, and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching soloist.ai

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
90
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on AI-driven website creation tools for small businesses. Its business model appears to be freemium or free service with potential upsells or domain connection features. The market positioning is as a user-friendly, accessible AI website creator competing with other no-code platforms. The presence of Mozilla branding suggests some partnership or endorsement, which could enhance credibility. The company is small and newly founded, with no visible subsidiaries or parent companies. Revenue streams are not disclosed but likely include premium features or domain services. The target customers are small business owners needing quick online presence. Growth indicators include modern tech stack adoption and integration with Google services for analytics and identity. Strategic observations include the need to build trust through privacy and security transparency and expand marketing to increase adoption.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and reputable domain registrar MarkMonitor with domain status locks to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice for DNS security. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs are published on the site, indicating gaps in security governance and transparency. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also reflects compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible. Overall, the site is secure enough for general use but should improve transparency and implement additional security controls and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels like security@ or abuse@ emails.
  5. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DNStination Inc.
Description
Create a beautiful website for your business from a few simple inputs
Key services
AI website creation, Custom domain connection
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Bootstrap 5.3, Google Identity Services, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Next.js, Bootstrap
Platforms
Vercel or similar (inferred from Next.js usage)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website offers free AI website creation targeting small businesses
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  4. Uses modern web technologies and frameworks
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business
  7. No WAF or blocking detected
  8. Content is safe and business relevant
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Next.js and React, with Bootstrap 5.3 for styling. It uses Google Identity Services for authentication and Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating integration with major cloud and marketing platforms. Hosting is likely via a CDN or cloud provider associated with Akamai, based on the name servers. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and images, but no explicit performance metrics were available. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic but present. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags included. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers. The site is well structured but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO improvements. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or framework-based build. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a startup but has room for security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with soloist.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review soloist.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.