Skip to main content

Security report for solidoak.com

27LABS, LLC · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

27LABS, LLC is a small technology company specializing in Windows security and content management software products, including CYBERsitter and CYBERsitter BLACK for networks, as well as a Zero-hour Blacklist service for firewalls and servers. They also offer a weather-related application called Teapot for Tempest Weather Stations. The company has been in business since 1990, positioning itself as a niche provider with a focus on home users, schools, libraries, and network administrators. Their business model emphasizes one-time purchases with free updates and no recurring fees, appealing to customers seeking reliable security solutions without subscription commitments. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear product offerings and relevant information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching solidoak.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
97
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a specialized market segment focused on Windows security and network content filtering, with additional offerings in weather applications. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing presence since 1990 and their no recurring fee model. The website promotes CIPA compliance and highlights free updates, which are strong selling points for educational and home environments. The presence of dedicated subdomains for products indicates a structured product ecosystem. Partnerships with related domains like teapotapp.com and bestblacklist.com suggest a collaborative approach to expanding their product portfolio. However, the lack of visible direct contact emails or phone numbers may limit immediate customer engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses iframe-based contact forms to isolate user input, which is positive. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response information reduces transparency. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, but no cookie consent mechanism was found, which may impact GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and explicit cookie policy to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan to increase transparency and trust.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility by providing verified company emails and phone numbers for better customer support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
27LABS, LLC
Description
27LABS publishes award winning Windows security and content management and security software for Windows PC's and servers.
Key services
CYBERsitter for Windows, CYBERsitter BLACK for Networks, Zero-hour Blacklist for Firewalls and Servers, Teapot app for Tempest Weather Stations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, jQuery 2.2.4, Bootstrap, Tether.js, Font Awesome, RapidWeaver Foundry theme, Stacks plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Windows (targeted by software products), iOS and Mac (Teapot app)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of iframe for forms to isolate input

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is focused on Windows security and content management software products.
  3. Multiple product offerings with dedicated subdomains.
  4. Privacy and terms of service pages are present and accessible via modal dialogs.
  5. Contact form is embedded via iframe on contact page.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content.
  7. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  8. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
  9. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the RapidWeaver CMS with the Foundry theme and multiple Stacks plugins, leveraging Bootstrap and jQuery for responsive design and interactivity. It uses Google Fonts for typography and Font Awesome for icons. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. The use of iframe for forms is a good practice for isolating user input. However, the hosting provider is not identified, and no advanced frameworks beyond Bootstrap are detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and improved security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with solidoak.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review solidoak.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.