Skip to main content

Security report for softwarereviews.com

SoftwareReviews · Technology · Canada

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SoftwareReviews, a division of Info-Tech Research Group established in 1997, provides comprehensive, data-driven enterprise software reviews and vendor insights. Positioned as a leading authority in the technology research sector, it offers detailed reports such as Data Quadrant and Emotional Footprint to assist IT and business professionals in making informed software purchasing decisions. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure leveraging modern technologies including Rollbar for error monitoring, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar for user behavior analytics, and robust cookie consent mechanisms ensuring GDPR compliance. The security posture of the website is strong, with HTTPS enforced, multiple security certifications displayed, and integration of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate bot activity. While explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published, the site follows best practices in data protection and user privacy. The domain registration details align well with the business claims, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the site is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a high-quality user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Strategic recommendations include publishing a dedicated security policy and incident response information, implementing a vulnerability disclosure program, and continuous auditing of third-party scripts to maintain security integrity. These steps will further enhance the site's trust and compliance posture, supporting its market leadership in enterprise software research.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of softwarereviews.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching softwarereviews.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SoftwareReviews operates within the technology sector, focusing on enterprise software evaluation and advisory services. Its business model centers on collecting authentic user data to generate detailed software reviews and comparative reports, serving IT professionals and decision-makers. The company benefits from its parent organization, Info-Tech Research Group, which adds credibility and resources. The website's extensive category listings and report offerings indicate a broad market reach and diversified service portfolio. Partnerships and integrations with marketing and analytics platforms support its growth and customer engagement strategies. The presence of certifications and social media activity further solidify its market position and brand reputation.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA v3, and integration of Rollbar for real-time error monitoring. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR, offering users granular control over tracking categories. Certifications such as ISO 27001 and AICPA SOC indicate organizational commitment to information security standards. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security policy and incident response contact limits transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security measures align well with industry best practices, though improvements in disclosure and incident readiness communication are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance transparency around data protection officer contact details and data handling practices.
  5. Maintain and promote certifications and trust signals to reinforce market confidence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SoftwareReviews
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SoftwareReviews
Description
SoftwareReviews is a division of Info-Tech Research Group, a world-class IT research and advisory firm established in 1997. Backed by two decades of experience, SoftwareReviews is a leading source of expertise and insight into the enterprise software landscape and client-vendor relationships. By collecting real data from IT and business professionals, the SoftwareReviews methodology produces the most detailed and authentic insights into the experience of evaluating and purchasing enterprise software.
Key services
Enterprise software reviews, Comparative rankings and reports, Vendor and product insights, Data Quadrant and Emotional Footprint reports
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Rollbar, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Marketo, CookieYes, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Turbo Frames
Frameworks
Tailwind CSS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented
  • Rollbar error monitoring integrated
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Use of CSP and script integrity attributes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Marketo, LinkedIn Insight, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Marketo, Hotjar, CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong compliance with privacy and cookie regulations including GDPR
  3. Use of multiple security and analytics tools for monitoring and user experience
  4. Clear business identity with structured data and certifications displayed
  5. No signs of suspicious or malicious activity detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern technology stack including JavaScript frameworks, Tailwind CSS for styling, and Ruby on Rails backend (implied). It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics (Google Analytics, Hotjar), marketing automation (Marketo), and error tracking (Rollbar). The site is optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with accessibility considerations evident in ARIA labels and semantic HTML. SEO is supported through comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD schema. The use of Turbo Frames suggests progressive enhancement for dynamic content loading. Hosting details are not explicit, but CDN usage for assets indicates a distributed delivery approach. Overall, the technical implementation supports a fast, secure, and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with softwarereviews.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review softwarereviews.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.