Skip to main content

Security report for softexpert.com

SoftExpert · Technology · Brazil

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

93/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SoftExpert is a global software company specializing in business compliance, innovation, and digital transformation solutions. Their offerings target enterprises seeking to improve governance, risk management, and quality processes. The company maintains a professional online presence with a multilingual website and comprehensive service descriptions, positioning itself as a mature player in the technology sector. The website leverages modern web technologies including React (Next.js), HubSpot marketing tools, and various analytics platforms, indicating a digitally mature infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though the absence of a public security policy and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement. The missing WHOIS data for the domain raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, but the overall business credibility remains high based on website content and certifications. Strategic recommendations include publishing security policies, adding incident response contacts, and implementing vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching softexpert.com

This scan found 9 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
95
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
93

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention softexpert.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4,670
Employees
72
Customers
4,477
Third parties
121
Weak passwords
19%

Latest record dated 2026-06-05 · 528 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for softexpert.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –gitsoft.softexpert.com2026-06-05
  • –portalops.softexpert.com2026-06-05
  • –adsso.softexpert.com2026-05-26
  • –store.softexpert.com2026-05-21
  • –sesuite.softexpert.com2026-05-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SoftExpert operates primarily in the technology sector, focusing on compliance and digital transformation software for medium to large enterprises. Their business model is B2B, offering SaaS and software solutions that address regulatory compliance, risk, quality, and innovation management. The company demonstrates strong market positioning with ISO certifications and a global footprint. Their partnership ecosystem includes integrations with marketing and analytics platforms, supporting a data-driven growth strategy. The website content and structure reflect a professional approach aimed at decision-makers in regulated industries. Growth indicators include multilingual support and comprehensive service offerings. No direct parent or subsidiary companies were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and includes key security headers such as Content Security Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security documentation and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy page detailing security practices and controls.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SoftExpert Software Ltda
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SoftExpert
Description
SoftExpert provides software solutions for business compliance, innovation, and digital transformation.
Key services
Compliance management software, Innovation management, Digital transformation solutions, Risk management, Quality management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), JavaScript, HubSpot scripts, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Visual Website Optimizer
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple language support
  2. Professional business software provider with global presence
  3. Strong use of marketing and analytics tools
  4. Good privacy and cookie compliance with consent mechanisms
  5. No visible security policy or incident response contacts
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content
  8. No WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering capabilities. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including HubSpot, VWO, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Tag Manager, reflecting a sophisticated digital marketing strategy. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in loading third-party scripts. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring usability across devices. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and hreflang tags for multilingual support. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS solution. Hosting provider details were not identified. Technical risks include dependency on multiple third-party scripts which require continuous security monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with softexpert.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review softexpert.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.