Skip to main content

Security report for softasy.ro

Softasy · Technology · Romania

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Softasy is a Romanian software development company established in 2011, offering a broad range of digital solutions including mobile and web applications, e-commerce platforms, UX/UI design, and custom business software. The company positions itself as an innovative and client-focused provider with over 15 years of industry experience. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with clear service offerings and a focus on customer engagement. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various JavaScript libraries, with integrations for Google Analytics and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site benefits from HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks advanced DNS security and explicit security headers, suggesting room for improvement in hardening. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 20 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching softasy.ro

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Softasy operates in the technology sector, targeting businesses and startups needing custom software development and digital transformation. Their business model is service-based, focusing on delivering tailored digital products. The company leverages its 15+ years of experience to differentiate itself through innovation and client collaboration. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized company with a consistent brand and professional approach. The absence of explicit privacy policies and terms of service pages is a minor gap but does not detract significantly from credibility. The company uses Google Ads and Analytics for marketing and tracking, showing active digital marketing efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and integration of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to mitigate automated abuse. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR compliance efforts. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduce the overall security robustness. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could impact trust in handling security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be enhanced with additional best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to demonstrate readiness for security incidents.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Softasy
Description
Softasy is a software development company specializing in creating digital products including mobile apps, web apps, e-commerce solutions, UX/UI design, and custom business solutions. They emphasize innovation, quality, and customer-centric development with over 15 years of experience.
Key services
Mobile app development (iOS, Android, HTML5), Web programming, Custom business solutions, UX/UI design, E-commerce solutions, Strategy and branding
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.4.1, jQuery, OwlCarousel2, GSAP, SweetAlert, Swiper, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Moment.js, Daterangepicker
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-11368108479)
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information includes a Romanian phone number and contact forms.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  6. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business claims.
  7. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and popular front-end framework (Bootstrap 4.4.1) combined with jQuery and other JavaScript libraries such as OwlCarousel2, GSAP, and SweetAlert for UI enhancements. Google Analytics and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise are integrated for analytics and security. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate based on the technology stack and external resource usage. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found in the data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities for optimization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with softasy.ro. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review softasy.ro.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.