Skip to main content

Security report for soft2bet-invest.com

Soft2Bet Invest · Technology · N/A

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Soft2Bet Invest is an investment fund focused on empowering iGaming and casual gaming startups by providing financial and strategic support. The fund targets growth-stage companies and mature enterprises with pioneering technologies, aiming to foster innovation and high-margin gaming solutions. The website positions Soft2Bet Invest as a leader in gaming technology investment with a substantial fund size of 50 million EUR and individual investments ranging from 500,000 to 1 million EUR per project. Technically, the website is built on Webflow, leveraging modern web technologies and CDN services for fast performance and good mobile optimization. However, the SSL configuration lacks modern TLS protocol support, which is a security concern. The site lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, though it implements a cookie consent mechanism via CookieScript. Contact is facilitated through an external form hosted on heyflow.id, and social media presence is limited to LinkedIn. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in compliance documentation and SSL/TLS configuration.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching soft2bet-invest.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Soft2Bet Invest operates in the technology sector, specifically targeting the iGaming and casual gaming industries. Its business model revolves around an innovation fund that invests significant capital into startups showcasing pioneering technologies such as AI adoption, behavioral analytics, and user experience innovations. The fund's strategy to diversify investments minimizes risk and optimizes returns. The company leverages its parent company Soft2Bet's market position and expertise to attract and support promising ventures. The target audience includes entrepreneurs and startups in the gaming sector seeking funding and strategic partnerships. The partnership with heyflow.id for contact form hosting indicates a collaborative ecosystem approach. The absence of detailed company registration or founding information limits deeper business profiling.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. It employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforces HSTS with a long max-age, which are positive security practices. However, the lack of support for modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) is a significant weakness that could expose users to downgrade attacks or compatibility issues. No known SSL vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or POODLE are present. The site uses secure cookie attributes and a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks published privacy, security, or incident response policies, which are critical for GDPR and general compliance. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found, indicating limited transparency in security incident handling. Overall, the security culture appears nascent and would benefit from formalized policies and updated cryptographic standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols to strengthen SSL/TLS security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add terms of service and security policy pages to improve legal transparency.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Conduct an accessibility audit and enhance compliance with WCAG standards to improve inclusivity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging Google Fonts, jQuery 3.5.1, SmoothScroll.js, and Finsweet Attributes for enhanced UI/UX. Hosting is provided via Cloudflare CDN, ensuring fast content delivery and caching. The site uses chunked transfer encoding and HTTP/1.1 with keep-alive connections. Despite fast load times and good mobile optimization, the SSL configuration is outdated with no TLS support, which is a technical risk. The site tracks UTM parameters via localStorage and cookies, but no advanced analytics or tracking services are detected. The absence of structured data (JSON-LD) limits SEO potential. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from updated security protocols and enhanced SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with soft2bet-invest.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review soft2bet-invest.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.