Skip to main content

Security report for sockari.cz

JCMM, z. s. p. o. · Education · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

59/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website sockari.cz serves as a regional educational support platform dedicated to high school students in the South Moravian Region of the Czech Republic who are engaged in the SOČ competition, a national expert work contest. Operated by JCMM, a non-profit organization, the site provides financial grants, mentoring, and informational resources to students, supervisors, and coordinators. The platform is well integrated with partner sites and offers a range of educational projects and career development tools. Technically, the site employs modern frontend technologies including Google Fonts, jQuery, and Slick Carousel, hosted on Forpsi servers with HTTPS enabled and Google Analytics for user tracking. Security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional security headers and explicit incident response policies. Privacy compliance is supported by a GDPR cookie consent banner and linked privacy policy. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-targeted to its audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sockari.cz

This scan found 11 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
59

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JCMM positions itself as a key regional player in educational support for talented students, focusing on the SOČ competition and related STEM initiatives. Its business model is non-profit, emphasizing grants, mentoring, and educational networking. The organization leverages partnerships with multiple related portals to provide comprehensive services for students and schools. The website content and structure reflect a mature, consistent brand with a decade of operation. The target audience is clearly defined, and the site supports growth through various projects and community engagement. Revenue streams likely include public funding and grants, consistent with non-profit educational entities.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating attention to basic security and privacy standards. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content, and there is no public security policy or incident response information. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but privacy compliance is supported by GDPR notices. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers, transparency, and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize security risks and ensure privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JCMM, z. s. p. o.
Description
Web platform supporting high school students in the South Moravian Region (Jihomoravský kraj) who are writing or planning to write SOČ (Středoškolská odborná činnost) - a Czech national competition of expert works by talented students. JCMM provides financial grants, connects students and supervisors, and promotes quality education in the region.
Key services
Financial grants for SOČ projects, Information and tips for students, Support from mentors, Connecting students and supervisors, Career development portals, STEAM clubs and educational projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Bootstrap (navbar classes), Google Tag Manager (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on educational support for high school students in South Moravia.
  3. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond GDPR cookie consent found on main site; linked to JCMM site for GDPR.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly visible in provided HTML; contact likely via separate contact page.
  5. No forms detected on main page; contact likely via dedicated contact page.
  6. Social media presence includes LinkedIn, YouTube, Facebook, and podcast links.
  7. Use of modern frontend libraries and Google Analytics for tracking.
  8. No visible security headers in HTML; SSL is enabled.
  9. No terms of service or incident response information found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Google Fonts, jQuery, and Slick Carousel for UI components, supported by Bootstrap classes for responsive design. Hosting is provided by Forpsi, a Czech hosting provider, consistent with the regional focus. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph image tags. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight solution. The site uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, which should be monitored for privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sockari.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sockari.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.