Skip to main content

Security report for social-web-macht-schule.de

Social Web macht Schule · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Social Web macht Schule is a small educational organization based in Dresden, Germany, focused on promoting media literacy and digital media prevention among students, parents, and teachers. Their key services include workshops and prevention projects aimed at combating cyberbullying and encouraging safe use of social networks. The website is professionally designed using the Wix platform, featuring structured data for local business and website information, which supports their credibility. Technically, the site uses Wix's Thunderbolt framework and includes scripts to enhance security by hardening fetch and XMLHttpRequest calls. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap given GDPR requirements. Security headers are not detected, and there is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance trust and security posture. Overall, the website is safe, well-targeted to its audience, and demonstrates a moderate level of technical maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching social-web-macht-schule.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
48
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the education sector, specifically targeting digital media prevention and media competence. Their business model revolves around delivering workshops and prevention projects, likely funded through educational contracts or grants. The market position is niche, focusing on digital safety education in schools. The website content and structured data indicate a clear focus on their target audience of students, parents, and teachers. The lack of detailed WHOIS registrant information slightly reduces transparency but does not indicate suspicious activity. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content. The company maintains a consistent brand image and provides clear contact information, supporting business credibility.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and includes scripts aimed at securing client-side requests. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options limits protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms is a compliance risk under GDPR. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure practices are not publicly documented, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Social Web macht Schule
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Social Web macht Schule
Description
Social Web macht Schule fördert Medienkompetenz bei Schülern, Eltern und Lehrern durch Workshops und Präventionsprojekte. Lernen Sie, wie Sie Cybermobbing verhindern und soziale Netzwerke sicher nutzen. Jetzt informieren!
Key services
Workshops, Präventionsprojekte, Medienkompetenzförderung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, JavaScript polyfills, Wix Thunderbolt framework
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security override globals script to harden fetch and XHR

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix hosting and scripts.
  2. No visible privacy or cookie policies found despite GDPR relevance.
  3. Contact information is present but no email addresses found in HTML content.
  4. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  5. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Security scripts attempt to harden fetch and XMLHttpRequest usage.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
  8. SEO metadata and Open Graph tags are present and well-formed.
  9. Structured data (JSON-LD) for WebSite and LocalBusiness is implemented.
  10. No visible security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using the Thunderbolt framework, which provides a modern and modular architecture. The use of polyfills ensures compatibility across browsers. Hosting is managed by Wix, which offers reliable infrastructure and SSL support. Performance is moderate, typical for Wix-hosted sites, with good mobile optimization. SEO metadata and Open Graph tags are implemented, supporting search engine visibility and social sharing. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The technical stack is appropriate for a small educational organization but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with social-web-macht-schule.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review social-web-macht-schule.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.