Skip to main content

Security report for snoobi.com

Snoobi · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Snoobi is a Finnish-based technology company specializing in web analytics solutions that emphasize GDPR compliance and user privacy. Their platform offers comprehensive analytics services including advanced and intranet analytics, tailored for businesses seeking flexible and privacy-conscious data insights. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation with a strong focus on privacy through cookie consent mechanisms. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and integrates Cookiebot for consent management, alongside Cloudflare services for hosting and security. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and anti-CSRF protections, though explicit security headers and published security policies are absent. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises some legitimacy concerns, but the professional presentation and compliance features suggest a trustworthy business. Overall, the site is well-positioned in the European analytics market with a focus on privacy and customer support.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching snoobi.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Snoobi operates in the technology sector, targeting businesses and organizations requiring GDPR-compliant web analytics. Their SaaS business model is subscription-based, offering advanced analytics features and custom solutions. The company emphasizes European data privacy standards, which is a competitive advantage in the region. The website content and navigation indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a clear market position focused on privacy and support. Partnerships with Cookiebot and Cloudflare enhance their compliance and security capabilities. The lack of direct contact details and WHOIS transparency could be improved to strengthen trust. The company appears to maintain a focused ecosystem with no detected subsidiaries or parent companies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms that comply with GDPR. Use of anti-CSRF cookies indicates attention to common web security threats. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could be exploited. No security.txt or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency for vulnerability reporting. The WHOIS data absence is a concern for domain legitimacy and could be a risk factor. Overall, the site is secure for typical user interactions but could improve in transparency and header security to enhance defense-in-depth.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
  2. Add standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve browser security.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Improve transparency by providing verified company contact emails and phone numbers.
  5. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data absence to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Snoobi
Description
Snoobi provides comprehensive analytics solutions with GDPR compliance, flexible data views, and European-based support.
Key services
Web analytics, Advanced analytics, Intranet analytics, Custom analytics solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Typekit fonts, Cookiebot, Cloudflare Turnstile, Snoobi analytics script
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • Anti-CSRF cookies (.AspNetCore.Antiforgery.#)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Snoobi
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Snoobi, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Finnish language.
  2. Strong cookie consent and GDPR compliance mechanisms implemented.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found, only contact form.
  4. No WHOIS data available, which reduces trust but site appears professional.
  5. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics scripts.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Adobe Typekit for fonts, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Hosting and security services appear to be provided by Cloudflare, including the use of Cloudflare Turnstile for bot detection. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO basics such as canonical tags and hreflang attributes. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics and consent scripts. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and metadata completeness could enhance robustness and SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with snoobi.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review snoobi.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.