Skip to main content

Security report for smn.lt

UAB Santa Monica Networks · Technology · Lithuania

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Santa Monica Networks (SMN) is a well-established IT solutions provider specializing in data transmission networks, cybersecurity, cloud computing, and IT consulting services. With over 30 years of experience and a team of 50 professionals, SMN serves large and medium enterprises across telecommunications, finance, energy, and government sectors primarily in Lithuania and Latvia. The company maintains strong partnerships with global technology leaders such as Cisco, Dell, Palo Alto Networks, and IBM, reinforcing its market position as a trusted IT service provider. Technically, the website demonstrates a moderate to good digital maturity with a custom CMS, modern JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js, and integration of Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is mobile-optimized and includes cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. However, some improvements in accessibility and security headers could enhance the technical posture further. From a security perspective, SMN shows a solid baseline with HTTPS enforcement, ISO certifications (including ISO/IEC 27001), and secure form handling. The absence of explicit incident response contacts and security.txt files suggests room for improvement in transparency and vulnerability management. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, potentially impacting trust and legitimacy perceptions. Overall, SMN presents a professional and credible business front with strong technical and security foundations. Addressing WHOIS transparency and enhancing incident response visibility would strengthen trust and compliance further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching smn.lt

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
90
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention smn.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
5
Weak passwords
80%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for smn.lt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SMN occupies a strong niche in the Baltic IT market, leveraging long-standing partnerships and certifications to differentiate itself. Its business model focuses on B2B IT infrastructure and security services, targeting regulated and critical sectors such as finance and energy. The company’s growth is supported by a broad partner ecosystem and a reputation for early adoption of advanced technologies. Revenue streams likely include consulting, implementation, managed services, and support contracts. The website content and partner logos reinforce a mature and stable market presence, although the lack of detailed financial or founding year data limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

SMN demonstrates a mature security posture with ISO 27001 certification and secure web practices such as HTTPS and reCAPTCHA. The company’s focus on cybersecurity is evident through its SOC services and partnerships with leading security vendors. However, the website lacks explicit incident response contact details and a vulnerability disclosure policy, which are important for comprehensive security governance. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency, which could be a risk factor. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized vulnerability management disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit incident response and security contact information on the website.
  2. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve web security posture.
  4. Address WHOIS data transparency by ensuring domain registration details are publicly accessible or justified by privacy policies.
  5. Improve website accessibility features to meet broader compliance standards and enhance user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB Santa Monica Networks
VAT number
LT341626410
Registration number
134162647
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB Santa Monica Networks
Description
SMN provides innovative IT solutions with extensive experience in data transmission networks, cloud computing, and IT security. They serve large and medium businesses including telecom, finance, energy, and government sectors in Lithuania and Latvia.
Key services
Data transmission networks, SOC (Security Operations Center), Cybersecurity, Cloud computing, IT consulting and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA, Swiper.js (carousel), FontAwesome icons
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong presence of trusted global technology partners
  3. Clear contact information and multiple communication channels
  4. Cookie and privacy policies are implemented with consent mechanisms
  5. No visible security challenges or blocking mechanisms
  6. WHOIS data is missing or inaccessible, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  7. No explicit terms of service or incident response contacts found
  8. Use of Google reCAPTCHA to prevent spam on forms
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS with modern front-end technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Swiper.js for interactive carousels. Google reCAPTCHA integration helps prevent spam in forms. The site is mobile responsive and includes cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The absence of some security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs but could be improved with enhanced security configurations and better domain registration transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with smn.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review smn.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.