Skip to main content

Security report for slice.zone

Technology · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website skip.house is a personal site belonging to an individual named Skip, a computer programmer from California. The site appears to serve as a personal portfolio or blog, focusing on interests such as electronic music, UI design, rhythm games, and languages. The domain is newly registered in March 2024 and hosted via Cloudflare, using a modern React and Next.js technology stack. However, the site currently displays an application error page, limiting content accessibility and analysis. From a technical perspective, the site uses contemporary web frameworks but lacks advanced SEO, accessibility, and performance optimizations. There are no detected privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, nor any contact information or security policies published. Security posture is basic, with no DNSSEC enabled and no security headers detected, which could expose the site to certain risks. Overall, the security posture is weak, with no incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms evident. The domain registration is consistent with the personal nature of the site, and no suspicious patterns were found. The site does not contain any adult or questionable content and targets a general audience. The lack of policies and contact information, combined with the application error, reduces trustworthiness and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include fixing the application error to restore site functionality, implementing privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC and security headers, and publishing security and incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching slice.zone

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention slice.zone, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for slice.zone right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Skip.house operates as a personal website for an individual programmer, targeting a niche audience interested in programming, electronic music, and related hobbies. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on personal expression and portfolio presentation. The site links to various external personal interest sites but does not engage in commercial partnerships or advertising. The domain is new, indicating a startup phase with limited market presence. There are no indications of revenue streams or formal partnerships. The site’s growth potential depends on content development and community engagement.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers, combined with no visible privacy or security policies, indicates gaps in security best practices. The site lacks incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The use of Cloudflare as registrar and hosting provider offers some baseline protection, but the application error page suggests potential issues in site stability. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not demonstrated. The site does not collect user data or have forms, reducing immediate risk but also limiting user engagement capabilities.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve the application error to restore full website functionality and content accessibility.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Enable DNSSEC and implement security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure process.
  5. Add clear contact information and consider adding analytics with privacy compliance to enhance business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal website of Skip, a computer programmer from California who enjoys electronic music, UI design, rhythm games, and languages.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Cloudflare
Frameworks
React, Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website currently shows an application error page indicating client-side exception.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers detected.
  4. No security policies or incident response information published.
  5. Site uses modern React/Next.js stack hosted on Cloudflare.
  6. Multiple external links to personal or related interest sites present.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  8. No forms or data collection mechanisms found.
  9. No SEO or accessibility best practices fully implemented.
  10. No DNSSEC enabled for domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js stack, hosted via Cloudflare. The technical infrastructure is contemporary but underutilized, with minimal SEO and accessibility features implemented. Performance is moderate but could be improved with optimization. The site currently suffers from an application error causing client-side exceptions, which prevents full content rendering. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal data collection. The domain lacks DNSSEC, and no security headers are present in the HTML, indicating potential security risks. Overall, the technical setup is modern but incomplete and requires remediation to improve stability, security, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with slice.zone. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review slice.zone.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.