Skip to main content

Security report for slabikarnfv.eu

Education · Slovakia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Šlabikár neformálneho vzdelávania' serves as an educational platform focused on improving the quality of non-formal education for youth workers primarily in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. It offers a methodological guide and an interactive e-learning tool developed through a partnership between YouthWatch, ANEV, and Luducrafts, supported by Erasmus+. The site targets youth educators and non-profit organizations involved in youth work, providing free resources to enhance educational practices. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, Google Analytics for tracking, and is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. However, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies and does not provide direct contact information, which impacts privacy compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with some best practices like CSRF token usage but missing security headers. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy policies, but the domain and content appear legitimate and consistent with the stated mission. Overall, the site is professionally designed and functional but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching slabikarnfv.eu

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project occupies a niche in the education sector, specifically targeting non-formal youth education in the Czech-Slovak region. It leverages partnerships with recognized organizations and EU funding, which strengthens its credibility and market position. The business model is non-profit, focusing on providing free educational content and e-learning tools. The target audience includes youth workers and educators seeking to improve their skills. The partnership ecosystem includes YouthWatch, ANEV, Luducrafts, and Erasmus+, indicating a collaborative approach. Growth potential lies in expanding e-learning offerings and increasing outreach. The absence of direct contact details and privacy policies suggests room for operational maturity improvements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection implemented. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency for security issues. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking without visible consent mechanisms, which may raise GDPR compliance concerns. Overall, the site is secure enough for its informational purpose but would benefit from enhanced security headers, privacy transparency, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly disclose a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including a dedicated security or abuse email address for incident reporting.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize potential vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides educational resources focused on non-formal education for youth workers, including a methodological guide and an e-learning platform. It is a project supported by YouthWatch and ANEV organizations, funded by Erasmus+.
Key services
Methodological guide publication, Interactive e-learning platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Smooth-DnD (drag and drop library), Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in meta tag

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the page.
  4. Use of Google Analytics for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  5. Content is focused on non-formal education for youth workers in Slovakia and Czechia.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy restrictions.
  7. Site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and includes CSRF token in meta tags.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. External links mostly to partner organizations and trusted domains.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based frontend with asynchronous loading of Google Analytics and a drag-and-drop library (Smooth-DnD). The presence of Bootstrap classes suggests a responsive design framework. The site is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance appears moderate with deferred script loading and optimized images. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA attributes and semantic HTML enhancements. SEO is basic with proper meta tags but lacks structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small educational project but has room for modernization and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with slabikarnfv.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review slabikarnfv.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.