Skip to main content

Security report for skolufoto.lv

SIA “Skolufoto” · Education · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Skolufoto.lv is a Latvian small business specializing in photography services for schools and kindergartens. The company offers photo prints, product printing, graduation albums, and tailored photo offers for educational institutions. The website is professionally designed with a clear focus on its target audience of schools, kindergartens, and parents in Latvia. The business model revolves around providing photography services with an online platform for ordering and profile management. Technically, the site uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap 3, and various plugins for UI and user experience enhancements. Analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar are integrated, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, there is room for improvement in security and privacy compliance, as no privacy or cookie policies are found, and security headers are missing. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skolufoto.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche local market focused on educational photography in Latvia. It leverages social media channels like Facebook and Twitter to engage with its audience. The business appears to have a stable presence with clear contact information and a consistent brand image. Revenue streams likely come from photography sessions, photo prints, and product printing services. The lack of detailed WHOIS data limits deeper insights into company age and ownership. The website's integration of multiple tracking and marketing tools suggests an interest in growth and customer engagement. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies may pose compliance risks under GDPR regulations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage implied but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or HSTS. Forms collect personal data but do not show anti-CSRF tokens or explicit privacy notices, which could expose the business to data protection risks. The use of third-party analytics and tracking services without cookie consent mechanisms further weakens privacy compliance. No incident response or security policies are published, indicating limited formal security governance. While no critical vulnerabilities are evident from the HTML content, the site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and compliance documentation to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Incorporate anti-CSRF tokens in all forms handling personal data to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
  4. Publish incident response and security policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “Skolufoto”
Description
Photography services specializing in schools and kindergartens, offering photo prints, product printing, graduation albums, and photo offers tailored for educational institutions.
Key services
School and kindergarten photography, Photo prints, Product printing, Graduation albums
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.6, Font Awesome 4.6.3, UAParser.js, Owl Carousel, Modaal, EasyZoom, ScrollToFixed, Chosen jQuery plugin, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded via https)
  • No visible exposure of sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Multiple forms collect personal data including names, phone numbers, and emails without visible privacy notices.
  5. Use of multiple third-party tracking and analytics services without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. Business contact information is clearly presented with company email and phone number.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, and Draugiem.lv.
  8. Website uses older versions of Bootstrap and Font Awesome but overall design is professional and consistent.
  9. No explicit security headers detected; security posture could be improved.
  10. No visible security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a moderately modern tech stack with jQuery, Bootstrap 3, and various UI plugins. While functional and mobile-optimized, the use of older Bootstrap and Font Awesome versions suggests some technical debt. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics and tracking scripts. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS or hosting provider information is detected. The site could improve by upgrading to newer frameworks, enhancing accessibility, and optimizing SEO metadata. Security-related technical improvements are recommended to strengthen the overall infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skolufoto.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skolufoto.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.