Skip to main content

Security report for skola6.lv

Skola 6 · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Skola 6 is a small educational institution based in Latvia, as indicated by the website content and contact information. The website serves primarily as a basic informational page providing contact details and branding with minimal content or interactive features. The target audience likely includes students, parents, and the local community. The business model is straightforward, focusing on education services without evident commercial or e-commerce components. Technically, the website is very simple, built with basic HTML and CSS without any detected CMS, frameworks, or advanced technologies. There are no scripts, analytics, or third-party integrations, which suggests a low digital maturity level. The site appears to have moderate performance but lacks modern SEO and accessibility features. Mobile optimization is basic but present. From a security perspective, the site lacks HTTPS/SSL, security headers, and privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for protecting user data and complying with regulations such as GDPR. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing immediate risk but also limiting user engagement. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy assessment, but the available information suggests a legitimate small educational entity. Overall, the website has a low security posture and minimal privacy compliance, with a basic technical implementation and content quality. Strategic improvements in security, privacy policies, and technical modernization are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skola6.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Skola 6 operates as a local educational institution in Latvia, targeting students and their families. The website's minimalistic design and content indicate a focus on providing essential contact information rather than extensive digital services. The lack of advanced features or integrations suggests limited digital transformation or online service offerings. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content. The business model is likely funded through public or local educational budgets rather than commercial revenue streams. Growth indicators or competitive positioning cannot be assessed due to limited data. The absence of social media or external links suggests a low digital marketing presence.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is weak. The absence of HTTPS/SSL is a critical vulnerability that exposes users to potential data interception. No security headers are implemented, increasing risk from common web attacks such as clickjacking or MIME sniffing. There are no visible forms or input fields, which reduces attack surface but also limits user interaction. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security contact information are missing, which could delay response to security incidents. Overall, the site demonstrates minimal security awareness and implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure data transmission.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Introduce clear incident response contact information and security policies.
  5. Enhance website technical SEO, accessibility, and mobile responsiveness for better user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Skola 6
Description
A website representing Skola 6, presumably an educational institution, providing basic contact information and branding.
Key services
Education
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is minimalistic with very basic content and styling.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with email and phone number.
  4. No external links or social media profiles detected.
  5. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  6. No scripts or third-party libraries detected.
  7. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or dates extracted.
  9. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  10. No advertising or analytics tools detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic HTML5 and CSS3 without any detected JavaScript libraries, frameworks, or CMS platforms. There is no evidence of server-side technologies or hosting provider information. The site lacks meta tags beyond the title and charset, limiting SEO effectiveness. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content but could be improved with modern best practices. Accessibility features are minimal, and mobile optimization is basic but functional. The absence of analytics or tracking tools indicates limited data-driven insights. Overall, the technical implementation is simple and could benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skola6.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skola6.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.