Skip to main content

Security report for skip.build

Skip · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Skip is a technology company focused on building tools for sovereign communities, primarily in the blockchain and cross-chain interoperability space. Their key offerings include the Skip:Go API for seamless cross-chain application connectivity, the Skip:Go Widget for easy user onboarding, and Skip:Connect, a native oracle system for real-time data streaming. The company positions itself as a critical infrastructure provider for the emerging sovereign web, targeting developers and blockchain builders. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure using Vue.js and Nuxt.js frameworks, with responsive design and good performance. However, the site lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, and does not provide direct contact information, which are areas for improvement. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but missing security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms reduce the overall security maturity. Overall, Skip presents as a credible and professional technology startup with strong partnerships and a clear market focus.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skip.build

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Skip operates in the blockchain infrastructure sector, offering APIs and widgets that enable cross-chain interoperability and data streaming. Their business model revolves around providing developer tools and infrastructure services to sovereign communities and blockchain ecosystems. The presence of partner logos such as dydx, Neutron, Celestia, and others indicates a strong partnership ecosystem and market positioning. The company targets developers and builders in the blockchain space, aiming to simplify complex multi-domain interactions. Growth indicators include active developer documentation, job listings, and social media presence. The lack of detailed business registration or physical address information suggests a startup or early-stage company. Strategic observations include the need to enhance compliance and security transparency to build further trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie policy, or vulnerability disclosure page, indicating gaps in compliance and incident response readiness. No contact channels for security incidents were found. The absence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries is positive, but the lack of security best practices documentation and contact information reduces the overall security posture. The site does not appear to use tracking or analytics scripts that could raise privacy concerns. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in transparency and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Add explicit contact information including security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Skip
Description
Skip builds tools for sovereign communities, providing infrastructure for cross-chain control flow and multi-domain interactions. Their offerings include Skip:Go API for cross-chain application connectivity, Skip:Go Widget for easy onboarding, and Skip:Connect, a native oracle system for real-time on-chain and off-chain data streaming.
Key services
Skip:Go API, Skip:Go Widget, Skip:Connect oracle system
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Nuxt.js, JavaScript, SVG graphics
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  4. Strong focus on blockchain interoperability and developer tools
  5. Use of modern web technologies and responsive design
  6. Presence of partner logos enhances trust
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks Vue.js and Nuxt.js, indicating a contemporary and maintainable tech stack. The use of SVG graphics and responsive design demonstrates attention to visual quality and mobile optimization. Preloading of scripts and fonts suggests performance optimization efforts. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site loads quickly and is well-structured, but lacks advanced SEO metadata beyond basic Open Graph and Twitter card tags. Accessibility is basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected in the provided HTML. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking scripts, which may be intentional for privacy reasons. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skip.build. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skip.build.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.