Skip to main content

Security report for skimlinks.com

Skimlinks · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

90/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Skimlinks operates as a leading affiliate marketing platform specializing in commerce content monetization. The company provides automated technology that converts product links in commerce-related content into affiliate links, enabling publishers, merchants, influencers, and creators to monetize their content effectively. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with multi-language support, structured data for SEO, and a clear focus on its target audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO, integrating Google Tag Manager and consent management tools to ensure compliance and analytics tracking. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers and explicit privacy policies are absent. The WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy protection, but the website's professionalism and ecosystem of related subdomains indicate a legitimate and established business. Overall, the site is well-designed, user-friendly, and trustworthy, with room for improvement in transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of skimlinks.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skimlinks.com

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
75
Email security
95
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
90

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention skimlinks.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
8,145
Employees
0
Customers
8,144
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
7%

13 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for skimlinks.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Skimlinks holds a strong market position as an industry leader in affiliate marketing solutions, targeting publishers, merchants, and content creators. Its business model revolves around automated affiliate link monetization, generating revenue through partnerships and affiliate programs. The company supports a broad ecosystem with dedicated resource centers and portals for different user segments, indicating a scalable and service-oriented approach. The presence of multiple language versions suggests a global or multi-regional market focus. While direct business registration details are not disclosed, the website's content and structure reflect a large, technology-focused enterprise with a professional brand image and consistent messaging.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and a comprehensive cookie consent banner that allows granular user control, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and others reduces the overall security posture. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were detected in the provided content, which are critical for compliance and user trust. There is no evidence of a published vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact, which could be improved to enhance security transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced headers, policy disclosures, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main site.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Skimlinks
Description
Skimlinks is the leading commerce content monetization platform. Its technology automatically monetizes product links in commerce-related content
Key services
Commerce content monetization, Affiliate link automation, Publisher and merchant support, Affiliate program management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, ConsentManager cookie consent
Frameworks
Elementor, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Google Optimize
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content.
  3. Cookie consent banner is present and functional with granular user controls.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Website uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. WHOIS data is not publicly available, possibly due to privacy protection or registrar policies.
  7. Multiple subdomains and partner/support sites indicate a mature business ecosystem.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  9. No explicit security or incident response contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It integrates multiple Google Tag Manager containers and Google Analytics for tracking and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and optimization. The use of consent management tools indicates attention to privacy compliance. However, the hosting provider is not explicitly identified, and no advanced frameworks beyond WordPress plugins are detected. The technical stack is solid for a content-driven affiliate marketing platform but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 90/100Low19 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skimlinks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skimlinks.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.