Skip to main content

Security report for skilljet.io

Brainstorm Force · Education · India

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SkillJet is an established e-learning platform operated by Brainstorm Force, targeting web entrepreneurs, business owners, and marketers seeking to enhance their skills in web design and online business growth. The platform offers a subscription-based business toolkit membership granting access to exclusive courses created by vetted industry experts. The website leverages WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, integrating various marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. Despite a mature content offering and consistent branding, the site currently lacks a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to security risks and undermining trust. SPF records are misconfigured, and no cookie consent mechanism is present, indicating gaps in privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching skilljet.io

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention skilljet.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
137
Employees
0
Customers
137
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
10%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for skilljet.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SkillJet operates in the education sector with a focus on online courses for web professionals. Its business model centers on a bundled subscription offering, the Business Toolkit, which includes access to premium courses and partner products. The company benefits from the reputation and resources of Brainstorm Force, a known entity in the WordPress ecosystem. The platform's partnerships with various WordPress-related service providers enhance its market position. The target audience includes freelancers, agencies, and entrepreneurs in the web design space. The website's content strategy emphasizes actionable, expert-led learning with frequent updates and a focus on business growth. However, direct contact details are limited to a contact form, which may impact customer support perception.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS protocol support, which are critical for secure communications. The presence of multiple SPF records invalidates email sender policies, potentially increasing the risk of email spoofing. No HTTP security headers were detected, and advanced security features such as HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption are not implemented. While no immediate vulnerabilities like subdomain takeover or known exploits were found, these deficiencies expose the site and its users to potential risks. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent mechanism and privacy policies hosted on a related but separate domain. Overall, the site requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and maintain trust.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and protect user data.
  2. Consolidate SPF records into a single valid record to ensure proper email authentication and reduce spoofing risks.
  3. Implement HTTP security headers including HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  5. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and inform users about tracking.
  6. Consider hosting privacy and security policies directly on the main domain for better user trust and compliance.
  7. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to avoid vulnerabilities and ensure compatibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress stack using Elementor for page building and WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It integrates multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools, including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. The site uses Cloudflare for DNS and domain registration but does not currently leverage Cloudflare's SSL or security features effectively. Performance is suboptimal with a high page load time (~12 seconds) and a large number of resources (233), suggesting opportunities for optimization. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility are rated good, supported by modern CSS and JavaScript frameworks. Structured data in JSON-LD format is implemented for SEO benefits. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires performance tuning and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with skilljet.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review skilljet.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.