Skip to main content

Security report for sitevision.se

Sitevision AB · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sitevision AB operates a leading Swedish CMS platform focused on delivering engaging digital experiences for intranets and websites. The company leverages a modern technology stack including React and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools to provide a comprehensive digital solution. The website demonstrates strong digital maturity with excellent design, mobile optimization, and accessibility features. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements, reflecting a mature business with a solid market position in the technology sector.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of sitevision.se. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sitevision.se

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
35
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sitevision targets a broad range of sectors including public sector, banking, retail, and industry, offering a SaaS CMS platform enriched by a partner ecosystem and marketplace. The business model emphasizes flexibility, integrations, and user-friendly content management. The presence of numerous customer case studies and testimonials indicates strong market acceptance and customer satisfaction. Partnerships with developer and support sites enhance the ecosystem. The company maintains a consistent brand and provides comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, supporting its credibility and compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and uses nonce attributes in scripts to support Content Security Policy. Cookie consent is actively managed with granular categories and consent-based script activation. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy are not visibly set, representing an area for improvement. Incident response and security policy pages are not found, indicating potential gaps in transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional headers and documented incident response.

Recommendations

  1. Implement explicit Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate XSS risks.
  2. Add X-Frame-Options and Referrer-Policy headers to improve clickjacking and privacy protections.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to increase transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance data retention disclosures related to analytics and marketing tools.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sitevision AB
Description
Sitevision offers a CMS platform for websites and intranets focused on digital experiences that engage customers, employees, and citizens. It provides a flexible platform with many modules, integrations, and a marketplace.
Key services
CMS for intranets, CMS for websites, Marketplace integrations, Cloud hosting, Personalization, Web analytics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, React 17, React 18, Piwik Pro Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Sitevision CMS platform, Limepark Webapp Hero
Frameworks
Sitevision CMS, React
Platforms
Sitevision Cloud
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce attributes in scripts for CSP
  • Secure cookie flags (Secure, SameSite) implied in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Piwik Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Piwik Pro
Marketing tools
Pardot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  3. Multiple social media and partner integrations present.
  4. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  5. No signs of security blocking or WAF challenges.
  6. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  7. Customer testimonials and case studies enhance trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Sitevision CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript frameworks including React 17 and 18, and jQuery. It integrates Piwik Pro and Google Analytics for data collection, alongside marketing pixels from Facebook and LinkedIn. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance appears fast with preloading of key scripts and assets. The use of nonce attributes in scripts indicates attention to security best practices. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site uses a modular architecture with marketplace and partner integrations, supporting extensibility and scalability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sitevision.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sitevision.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.