Skip to main content

Security report for signi.com

Signi · Technology · Denmark

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Signi is a technology company specializing in digital signing and workflow solutions, targeting business and professional users. The website is built on WordPress and employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS with Cloudflare DNS services. Security measures include reCAPTCHA for bot protection and a cookie consent mechanism, though explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages are not detected in the scanned content. The domain is long-established since 2000, registered with a reputable registrar, and shows no suspicious patterns. Overall, the website demonstrates a moderate to good level of digital maturity and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching signi.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
95
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Signi operates in the technology sector with a focus on digital signing services, likely offering SaaS solutions for document workflows. The business model appears B2B, targeting enterprises and professionals needing secure digital transaction tools. The company has consistent branding and a professional online presence, though lacks visible direct contact information and detailed legal policies on the homepage. The use of LinkedIn Insight and Google Analytics indicates active marketing and user behavior tracking. The domain age and registration data support a credible and stable business operation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS, providing a secure transport layer. Security best practices include bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA and a cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR principles. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no advanced security headers are detected in the provided data. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which are recommended for improved security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analysis.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide explicit security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Signi
Description
Signi is a technology company providing digital solutions, likely focused on document signing or digital workflows based on the domain and branding.
Key services
Digital signing, Workflow automation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cloudflare DNS, Cookiebot, reCAPTCHA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Leady
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and scripts.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with Cookiebot.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the scanned content.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage content.
  5. Use of Google reCAPTCHA indicates bot protection on forms.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  7. WHOIS data shows domain is well-established and not privacy protected.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with jQuery and integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy management. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and DNS security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized and uses modern fonts and CSS styles. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility is basic but present. The site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are areas for technical improvement. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and more comprehensive legal disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with signi.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review signi.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.