Skip to main content

Security report for sigma.software

Sigma Software · Technology · Ukraine

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Sigma Software is a well-established global technology consulting and software development company founded in 2002, with a strong market position among the top 100 outsourcing companies worldwide. The company offers a broad range of services including custom software development, IT consulting, dedicated teams, cybersecurity, AI consulting, and legacy system modernization. Their target audience includes enterprises, product houses, and startups seeking reliable technology partners. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, comprehensive content, and multiple global offices, primarily in Ukraine and Europe. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks and integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a good level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, although performance is moderate. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the domain registration is privacy-protected but consistent with the business profile. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing security policies, incident response contacts, and implementing security headers. Privacy compliance is basic due to the absence of a visible privacy policy and terms of service. Business credibility is high with clear contact information, social proof, and trust indicators. The risk level is moderate with recommendations to enhance transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sigma.software

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Sigma Software operates in the technology sector with a focus on software development and IT consulting. Their competitive advantages include a large pool of over 2000 software experts, a 23-year history, and recognition by IAOP as a top outsourcing company. The business model revolves around delivering custom software solutions, dedicated development teams, and consulting services globally. Revenue streams likely include project-based development, managed services, and consulting fees. The company targets enterprises, startups, and product houses across multiple industries including finance, healthcare, telecom, and gaming. Their partnership ecosystem includes integrations with cloud providers and technology platforms. Strategic observations highlight a strong emphasis on innovation, global delivery, and customer-centric solutions.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate to good. The website uses HTTPS exclusively, employs cookie consent mechanisms, and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and readiness perception. GDPR compliance indicators are minimal due to missing privacy policy and terms of service. No vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the provided data. The company should improve compliance documentation, publish incident response contacts, and implement security headers to enhance security culture and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main navigation.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sigma Software
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sigma Software
Description
Sigma Software development company offers turnkey solutions development and software development teams. Learn how our 2000 + software experts can support a project.
Key services
Custom software solutions development, IT consulting and services, Dedicated software teams establishment & operations, Software testing, UI/UX design, Cybersecurity services, Regulatory compliance consulting, AI consulting, Legacy modernization and migration, Data analytics consulting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google Custom Search Engine, WordPress, WPML Multilingual CMS, Swiper.js, Google Maps API, Cookielaw.org cookie consent, DMCA badge
Frameworks
Bootstrap (navbar classes), WordPress theme EMS3
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled (implied by https URLs)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML
  • Use of security-related services like Google Tag Manager with nonce attributes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Marketing tools
Google Custom Search Engine
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and rich content.
  2. Strong global presence with multiple offices worldwide.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage or main navigation.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and active.
  5. Contact information is comprehensive including email, contact form, and multiple physical addresses.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress with WPML).
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
  9. WHOIS privacy protection used but justified and domain age consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a custom EMS3 theme and uses WPML for multilingual support. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Google Custom Search Engine for analytics and search functionality. The site uses Swiper.js for sliders and Google Maps API for location display. Cookie consent is managed via cookielaw.org scripts. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and modern CSS variables for theming. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich media content and multiple external scripts. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified but domain registrar is GoDaddy. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and lack of advanced security headers. Opportunities exist for performance optimization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sigma.software. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sigma.software.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.