Skip to main content

Security report for sig1psk.lv

Siguldas 1.pamatskola · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Siguldas 1.pamatskola is a primary educational institution based in Sigulda, Latvia, providing comprehensive educational services including curricular and extracurricular activities. The website serves as an information portal for students, parents, and the local community, detailing school programs, staff, projects, and achievements. The institution appears to be a small-sized local school with a focus on community engagement and educational development. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the GeneratePress theme, incorporating modern web technologies such as jQuery and Owl Carousel for interactive content display. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, some technical improvements could enhance performance and accessibility. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS, which is a positive indicator. However, the absence of security headers and privacy/cookie policies suggests gaps in security best practices and compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which could be improved to enhance trust and security posture. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy for its educational purpose but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security measures. The lack of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy assessment, but the content and domain name align with a legitimate educational entity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sig1psk.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The school operates in the education sector, targeting students, parents, and educators within the Sigulda region. Its business model is that of a public educational institution, focusing on delivering primary education and fostering community involvement through projects like Erasmus and KiVa. The website reflects a stable local market position with no evident commercial revenue streams. The absence of social media and limited contact information suggests a traditional communication approach. The school participates in recognized educational programs, indicating active engagement in educational development and partnerships. Growth indicators are not explicit, but the presence of multiple projects and events suggests ongoing activity and community presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance issues with GDPR and related regulations. The site does not provide incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, limiting its readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended security headers, privacy compliance documentation, and incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including official emails and phone numbers for better business credibility.
  4. Establish an incident response page or contact channel to improve security readiness.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Siguldas 1.pamatskola
Description
Siguldas 1.pamatskola is an educational institution providing primary education services in Sigulda, Latvia. The website offers information about the school, its staff, educational programs, projects, achievements, and events.
Key services
Primary education, Extracurricular activities, Educational projects (e.g., Erasmus, KiVa), School events and achievements dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Google Fonts
Frameworks
GeneratePress theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based official site for a Latvian primary school.
  2. Content is rich with educational programs, events, and staff information.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage or footer.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. Site uses HTTPS and modern web fonts and scripts.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the GeneratePress theme, which is lightweight and performance-oriented. It utilizes jQuery and Owl Carousel for interactive elements, and Google Fonts for typography. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility features and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external CSS and JS resources. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small educational website but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sig1psk.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sig1psk.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.