Skip to main content

Security report for shore.com

Shore GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Shore GmbH operates a professional website offering SaaS solutions focused on appointment scheduling, customer management, and marketing automation primarily targeting small to medium-sized businesses in Germany. The company has a strong market presence supported by a domain age of over 25 years and a modern technology stack based on React and Gatsby frameworks. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience, although explicit privacy and cookie policies are not detected in the provided content. Security posture is moderate with no detected security headers or explicit policies, and DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be improved. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating a legitimate and stable operation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching shore.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention shore.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,417
Employees
6
Customers
1,402
Third parties
9
Weak passwords
0%

Latest record dated 2026-02-05 · 9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for shore.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –secure.shore.com2026-02-05
  • –secure.shore.com2025-11-14
  • –shore.com2025-07-22
  • –secure.shore.com2025-07-20
  • –yourapp.shore.com2025-06-30

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate shore.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
101
Registered
101
Resolving
101
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-19

Masked preview

  • sj•••.comMediumbitsquatting
  • wh•••.comMediumbitsquatting
  • sh•••.comMediumbitsquatting

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of shore.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Shore GmbH is positioned as an important player in the German technology sector, providing essential SaaS tools for business management. Their business model relies on subscription-based software services targeting service providers and SMEs. The company benefits from a long-established domain and professional branding. However, the lack of visible privacy and security policies on the website may impact trust and compliance perception. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data. The company appears focused on organic growth and maintaining a solid digital presence.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and is hosted on AWS infrastructure, which is positive. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement in security hardening. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found, which is a gap in security transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The security score is moderate, reflecting these mixed findings.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add clear contact information including support and security incident contacts.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to improve security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Shore GmbH
Description
Shore offers software solutions for appointment scheduling, customer management, and marketing aimed at businesses to improve operational efficiency and customer engagement.
Key services
Appointment scheduling, Customer management, Marketing automation, Online booking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, AWS DNS
Frameworks
React, Gatsby
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Website uses modern React and Gatsby frameworks indicating a modern tech stack.
  5. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the provided content.
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
  7. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Gatsby, indicating a contemporary and maintainable codebase. Hosting on AWS DNS infrastructure suggests reliable performance and scalability. The site appears mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags. However, no CMS is detected, and no analytics or marketing tools are evident in the provided content. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance measures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with shore.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review shore.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.