Skip to main content

Security report for sharepoint.com

Microsoft Corporation · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Microsoft Corporation operates the website providing Microsoft SharePoint services, a leading enterprise content management and collaboration platform integrated within the Microsoft 365 ecosystem. The site targets business and enterprise users, offering advanced security, compliance, and productivity tools. The company holds a dominant market position in technology and cloud services, supported by a comprehensive portfolio of products and services. The website is localized for Finnish users, reflecting Microsoft's global reach and localization capabilities. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks and performance optimization tools. The site is hosted on Microsoft Azure, ensuring robust infrastructure and scalability. The design is professional, mobile-optimized, and accessible, with strong SEO and user experience considerations. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, implements multiple security headers, and follows best practices for data protection and privacy compliance, including GDPR adherence. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure channels are clearly defined, and Microsoft maintains multiple certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC reports, underscoring its commitment to security and compliance. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility, technical maturity, and security posture. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were detected. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data is consistent with privacy protection practices for large enterprises and does not detract from the domain's legitimacy.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of sharepoint.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sharepoint.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
93
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Microsoft's market positioning as a technology giant is reinforced by its comprehensive product suite including SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, and Azure cloud services. The business model revolves around subscription-based licensing and cloud service delivery, targeting enterprises, SMBs, educational institutions, and government sectors. Revenue streams are diversified across software licenses, cloud subscriptions, and partner ecosystems. The company demonstrates strong growth indicators through continuous innovation, AI integration (e.g., Microsoft 365 Copilot), and strategic partnerships. The partner ecosystem includes official partner portals and marketplaces, facilitating broad adoption and service extension. Microsoft's operational scale and brand strength provide competitive advantages in security, compliance, and global reach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no exposed sensitive information. Microsoft’s adherence to international security standards such as ISO 27001 and NIST frameworks is evident. The presence of dedicated incident response contacts and a public vulnerability disclosure program indicates proactive security management. Privacy compliance is robust, with clear policies and consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. No vulnerable or outdated libraries were detected in the analyzed scripts. The security score is high, reflecting best practices and continuous monitoring. The main recommendation is to maintain vigilance on third-party scripts and evolving threat landscapes.

Recommendations

  1. Continue regular security audits and penetration testing to identify emerging vulnerabilities.
  2. Enhance transparency on data retention policies to strengthen privacy compliance.
  3. Implement additional user education on security best practices within the platform.
  4. Expand incident response capabilities with automated threat detection and response.
  5. Maintain and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate supply chain risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Microsoft Corporation
Description
Microsoft provides Microsoft SharePoint, a secure enterprise content management and collaboration platform with advanced security and governance features.
Key services
SharePoint Online, Microsoft 365 Suite, Collaboration tools, Content management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Adobe Helix RUM, AEM (Adobe Experience Manager), HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
95/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies
  • Content Security Policy
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Helix RUM, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Adobe Helix RUM
Marketing tools
ContentSquare, MediaPixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and professionally designed.
  2. Content is comprehensive and localized in Finnish.
  3. Strong security and privacy policies are in place.
  4. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  5. WHOIS data is not publicly available but domain is legitimate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack including Adobe Experience Manager CMS and JavaScript libraries for dynamic content and user interaction. Hosting on Microsoft Azure provides scalability and resilience. Performance is optimized with lazy loading, deferred scripts, and responsive design. Accessibility features are well implemented, supporting diverse user needs. SEO is enhanced through proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured content. The technical infrastructure supports a seamless user experience with fast load times and mobile optimization. Opportunities exist to further modernize by adopting newer JavaScript frameworks or progressive web app features to enhance interactivity and offline capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low22 findingsView report
  2. 79/100Low22 findingsView report
  3. 75/100Medium3 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sharepoint.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sharepoint.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.