Skip to main content

Security report for sga.rs

Serbian Games Association · Technology · Serbia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Serbian Games Association (SGA) is a non-profit organization dedicated to fostering the growth and development of the gaming industry in Serbia. The website serves as a central hub for industry news, events, job listings, and educational programs aimed at supporting game developers and related professionals. The organization positions itself as a key player in the Serbian gaming ecosystem with active partnerships and a clear mission to promote successful video game development in the region. The website is bilingual, primarily in Serbian with English options, catering to both local and international audiences interested in the Serbian gaming market. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.2, utilizing modern web technologies such as jQuery and Google Fonts. It features a responsive design with good mobile optimization and SEO practices, including structured data markup and meta tags. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors or broken elements detected. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure data transmission. From a security perspective, the site implements basic best practices such as HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers, which could be improved to enhance protection against DNS spoofing and common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, indicating room for maturity in security governance. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid business credibility and technical foundation suitable for a non-profit industry association. The content is relevant, professionally presented, and trustworthy. The risk profile is low, with no signs of malicious activity or content safety concerns. Strategic improvements in security policies and technical hardening would further strengthen the organization's digital posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching sga.rs

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SGA occupies a niche as the primary non-profit association for the Serbian gaming industry, providing advocacy, networking, and career development services. Its business model revolves around supporting industry stakeholders through events, mentorship, and information dissemination rather than direct commercial sales. The organization benefits from partnerships with European gaming federations and local industry players, enhancing its influence and resource access. The job listings and educational programs indicate active engagement with the talent pipeline, positioning SGA as a facilitator of industry growth. The website's bilingual nature and professional presentation suggest ambitions to connect Serbian developers with broader European and global markets. Growth indicators include regular events, news updates, and a visible social media presence. The absence of commercial advertising or affiliate programs aligns with its non-profit status.

Security posture

The website maintains a basic but adequate security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents missed opportunities to mitigate DNS attacks and clickjacking risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content, and no forms on the homepage collect personal data, reducing attack surface. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for the organization's scope but improvable to align with best practices for industry associations handling member data and communications.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Serbian Games Association
Description
SGA is a non-profit organization dedicated to the development of the domestic gaming industry in Serbia through various programs, projects, and initiatives.
Key services
Industry advocacy, Events and meetups, Job listings in gaming, Educational programs, Mentorship and support for game developers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Fonts, Slick Carousel
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent popup implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional non-profit association site for the Serbian gaming industry.
  2. Content is primarily in Serbian with English alternate language available.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with clear user interaction.
  4. No contact phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed.
  5. No terms of service page found.
  6. Social media presence is strong with official links to Discord, Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn.
  7. No visible forms collecting personal data on the homepage.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.8.2, leveraging jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. It uses the Slick Carousel library for interactive sliders. The site is hosted with a registrar identified as Webglobe d.o.o., indicating a regional hosting provider. Performance is moderate with no critical errors, and the site is mobile responsive with good SEO optimization including meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate but lacks advanced DNS security features like DNSSEC. No advanced security headers are detected, and no forms collecting personal data are present on the homepage, reducing risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable and appropriate for a small non-profit organization but could benefit from security hardening and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with sga.rs. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review sga.rs.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.