Skip to main content

Security report for serveruadministrators.lv

Vladimir Kiselyov · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website serveruadministrators.lv represents an independent IT professional, Vladimir Kiselyov, specializing in Linux and Windows server administration, network security, hosting management, and related IT services. The business targets clients primarily in Latvia and offers both task-based and ongoing support services. The site is well-structured with detailed service descriptions, client references, and partner affiliations, indicating a solid market presence in the regional technology sector. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including Materialize CSS, jQuery, and integrates analytics tools such as Yandex Metrika and Google Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no advanced security headers or explicit security policies are present. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which is a compliance gap. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching serveruadministrators.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small independent IT service provider focusing on server and network administration, primarily for Linux and Windows environments. Its competitive advantage lies in extensive experience (15+ years), a diverse client portfolio, and partnerships with recognized technology providers and hosting companies. Revenue streams likely include hourly task fees and monthly support contracts. The target customers are businesses and organizations requiring reliable IT infrastructure management. The partnership ecosystem includes hosting providers, OS vendors, and software tools, enhancing service quality. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on technical expertise and client trust. Growth indicators include a broad client base and multiple service offerings. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to improve compliance and security posture to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, but no HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML, and forms use POST methods, indicating basic secure data handling. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. The site uses third-party analytics and chat widgets, which require proper privacy management. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and security readiness.
  4. Conduct a security audit of SSL/TLS configuration to ensure strong encryption and prevent vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine ranking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vladimir Kiselyov
Description
Independent Linux system administrator and developer from Riga, Latvia with over 15 years of experience providing server administration, security, monitoring, and optimization services for various server types including managed, VPS/VDS, cloud, and dedicated servers.
Key services
Linux server administration, Windows server administration, Network security administration, Hosting management, Content management, SEO optimization, Backup and restore, Load balancing and failover, Corporate network setup, Video surveillance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Materialize CSS, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Roboto), Yandex Metrika, Google Analytics, JivoSite chat widget
Frameworks
Materialize
Platforms
Linux, FreeBSD
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied (site uses https URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Forms use POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrika, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
JivoSite chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Russian language.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. Multiple service offerings detailed with pricing and technical descriptions.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information present.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. Use of modern frontend libraries and analytics tools detected.
  9. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, and Materialize CSS framework. It integrates Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icons. Analytics tools include Yandex Metrika and Google Analytics, and a live chat widget from JivoSite is present. The site is mobile responsive and has good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified, but partner hosting companies are referenced. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing privacy compliance features. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and improve SEO and accessibility standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with serveruadministrators.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review serveruadministrators.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.